Quote:
Originally Posted by tedstriker
I disagree. If the AI is willing to accept a trade for the player I claimed, surely they should be willing to claim him in the absence of budget limitations. Why would they give up a player to get someone they could have claimed for free? If they need to dump salary first, that makes sense, but all my tests show that isn't the case.
Just to be clear, I'm not complaining. This is a minor issue. I just think a smarter AI should claim a player that they are willing to trade for. I can only speculate, but I'm guessing that the claiming logic and the trading logic are independent. Just something to consider for future versions.
|
Find an instance. Until that time I think Pain hit the nail on the head.
__________________
"The Minneapolis Lakers moved to Los Angeles, where there are no lakes; The Oilers moved to Tennessee where there is no oil; the Jazz moved to Salt Lake City where they don't allow music; The Oakland Raiders moved to Los Angeles and then back to Oakland, no one in Los Angeles seemed to notice."
Note to self: Princess Kenny was really off-putting.  
|