Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Grande Orange
Maybe so. And that's fine for personal use.
For commercial use, however, it's a different story, because U.S. copyright law at present is very clear: works created by AI programs CANNOT be copyrighted. ONLY works created by a human are eligible for copyright protection. This human authorship requirement is well-established, long-standing, and backed by legal precedent.
|
I agree with that. It is non copyrightable. Who implied otherwise? I just was pointing out that wire services will see themselves replaced someday for things that can be automated by AI. Just a matter of when. It's a wire service type story - not Sports Illustrated. The copyright is irrelevant. It's the cost of generating the report that matters.
And all that marketing copy you read on websites, advertising puffery, etc. will soon be mostly AI generated (with light editorial and legal review). That's not the kind of stuff anyone cares about copyrights for.
But we digress.