|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 24 - General Discussions Everything about the brand new 2023 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB, the MLBPA and the KBO. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
How Do You Adjust League Fielding Averages?
I put a new year in for my league stats this season and recalculated.
I want 1958 stats for my league. The league fielding average is .985 for my new season... that's too high... I would like to lower the league FA to .978. League FA in MLB in 1958 was about .978. How do I lower the fielding average in OOTP?... I need to increase the number of errors to lower it.. In the past I did it trial-and-error using the Position Modifers... I would just increase each position by 10% until I got it down to .978. This seemed to work overall for the league, but I noticed my center fielders made more errors than they usually make...center fielders usually have better FA than the left fielders and right fielders. Can anyone help me regarding this? I am please with all the other stats for my league... team batting averages... team ERAs are fine... individual stats look normal, too. Last edited by Eugene Church; 03-22-2024 at 11:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
|
Are you saying OOTP has incorrect data for fielding percentage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
I am trying to play the 1958 season as the base for my stats... league fielding percentage is .985.... it should be .978 for 1958.
My league is fictional... over the 79 seasons I have changed the Position Modifiers by increasing the numbers for each posititon to lower the league fielding average. It has been stable for many seasons, except for this year when I recalculated and used 1958 as the base year. I think this is the problem... I think I need to put all the position modifiers at 1.000 for range and 1.000 for each position. Anyone have any ideas on what I should do? Last edited by Eugene Church; 03-22-2024 at 11:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
Here is a screenshot of the Position Modifiers.
If I change these numbers to 1.000 in Range... and 1.000 for each position, will I then get stats for the 1958 season in MLB? Attachment 1001925 Last edited by Eugene Church; 03-22-2024 at 11:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
What happens if I choose "Restore Default" Settings?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,481
|
I'm assuming that restore defaults will set them to whatever figures are in the historical modifiers file for 1958.
Are you working off a backup copy? Best advice I can give is to make a backup, load it up, try the default settings (do you make use of recalc?) and let it sim out the year to see what happens. If it works, great, dump those figures into your permanent save. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
|
I see BBRef says historical fielding percentage is .978. Where in the game does it say league fielding percentage is .985?
I suppose restore defaults might work, depending on what else you have changed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
Quote:
Team Reports and Info > League Reports > Fielding Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
Thanks to both of you for your help and advice.
I'll see if "Restore Defaults" will fix it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,256
|
Maybe the game did not bring in the 1958 FLD when you selected that season for your league. What year is the actual year of your league? Maybe the FLD stayed as that season.
I do not suggest messing with the Range values. If you want to bring down the FLD percentage, you need to actually consider the Error rate. In this instance you are getting .985 FLD, which is actually 15 errors per 1000 total chances. You want a .978 FLD, which is 22 errors per 1000 total chances. 22/15 = 1.467. I would try multiplying the error modifier for each position by 1.467. Take the value currently in there and multiply by 1.467. For example, RF is currently 0.919. Take 0.919 * 1.467 = 1.348 That is the new Error modifier for RF. Do the same for every position. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
|
Why would the game not bring in 1958 fielding? If it didn't isn't it a lot easier to use the restore defaults feature than to edit all the individual error rates?
Concerning multiplying by 1.467, how do you know the error rates are off by the same amount for every position? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
What Garlon suggested I have been doing over the years and it has worked well until this year when I selected stats for the 1958 season.
I say my system has worked well because the league fielding percentage remained steady around .975 to .978... the only problem is my first baseman and center fielders have poorer fielding averages than they should. I have learned to just live with this. However, I don't want league fielding average to be .985... that is way too high for the 1950s-style baseball I prefer. I guess I will just do what Garlon suggested and apply his formula to increase the number of errors in the league... I am not good with computers, but I can do this. I will let you know what happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
Thanks to all of you replied... much appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,966
|
Quote:
As I said, as long as the league FA is around .978, I will be happy... I can live with the first basemen and center fielders doing poorer than they should. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,611
|
Quote:
What you’d want to do is pull those error numbers lower but man that is walking a tightrope. You can do the math of 978/985 = what you’d want to multiply those numbers by but I’d make a copy of that save and run it to see if the numbers come out okay.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|