OOTP Developments Forums

OOTP Developments Forums (https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com//index.php)
-   OOTP 19 - General Discussions (https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com//forumdisplay.php?f=3935)
-   -   "Hardest" team to manage in OOTP19 (https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com//showthread.php?t=286069)

Bobble 03-14-2018 06:01 PM

"Hardest" team to manage in OOTP19
 
I've done this for the last couple of versions so I thought I'd trot this out again for this year. In summary, I'm looking at predicted record, prospect ranking, team payroll, and market size and factoring them together to rank which team has the toughest job ahead of them for the near future. I'm calling it "BobbleValue". Higher BobbleValue is a more difficult challenge. The table:

Code:

Team                W        L        Gms        BA        BR        TOTAL*PAYROLL        PayRate        Market        BobbleValue
Marlins                65        97        37        19        26        $82,962,142        1.55        28.57        6889
Royals                69        93        33        29        30        $110,562,500        2.14        7.25        5596
Mariners        81        81        21        30        25        $159,832,142        3.49        6.49        5130
Giants                82        80        20        26        28        $193,272,777        4.19        3.70        4354
Tigers                70        92        32        21        15        $122,120,000        2.48        8.33        4128
Mets                81        81        21        27        29        $148,662,000        3.32        4.41        4101
Orioles                75        87        27        17        20        $122,317,115        2.84        8.06        4024
Rockies                79        83        23        20        21        $127,787,500        2.93        7.69        3834
Diamondbacks        82        80        20        25        24        $125,520,000        2.74        7.94        3782
Rangers                79        83        23        23        17        $140,724,166        2.73        7.14        3355
Athletics        78        84        24        18        11        $50,698,333        1.37        30.30        2625
Pirates                76        86        26        16        16        $77,074,999        1.77        10.71        2408
Angels                84        78        18        14        18        $171,259,999        3.71        4.81        2343
Twins                82        80        20        12        14        $115,150,000        2.53        11.54        2237
Reds                72        90        30        9        9        $89,624,285        2.16        13.04        2108
Indians                93        69        9        22        23        $129,332,765        2.94        9.52        1837
Red Sox                93        69        9        24        22        $229,761,428        4.23        3.92        1735
Nationals        90        72        12        15        19        $174,447,858        3.77        4.57        1644
Cubs                94        68        8        28        27        $173,527,381        3.81        3.70        1611
Brewers                78        84        24        11        7        $83,965,000        2.00        10.00        1369
Rays                78        84        24        5        8        $71,613,332        1.56        28.57        1301
Cardinals        87        75        15        13        13        $141,085,000        2.81        5.04        1231
White Sox        66        96        36        4        2        $65,000,000        1.64        27.78        936
Blue Jays        87        75        15        7        10        $155,097,523        3.52        4.03        901
Phillies        74        88        28        6        6        $44,856,333        1.00        23.26        810
Padres                73        89        29        3        4        $81,333,333        1.52        16.67        629
Dodgers                94        68        8        8        5        $178,612,378        3.55        3.55        347
Braves                72        90        30        1        1        $109,807,709        2.15        12.77        231
Yankees                94        68        8        2        3        $157,870,357        3.43        4.12        139
Astros                101        61        1        10        12        $151,001,170        3.49        5.57        91


How the sausage is made:
Predicted wins were from Bleacher Report. Games Back = (max wins+1) - your wins. I took prospect rankings from both Baseball America (BA) and Bleacher Report (BR) and took an average. PayRate = Your Payroll/Min Payroll. Market was exported from OOTP, I took Market times Fan Interest, 3000 divided by that number, then took the square root -- all that to put market on a reasonable footing with the rest of the factors. BobbleValue is GamesBack*Prospect*Payrate*(Market^.5). I wanted to make payroll and market less significant than winning and prospect list.

A team predicted to have the most wins, with the highest ranked organizational talent, with the lowest payroll, and the largest market would be 1*1*1*1 = BobbleValue of 1. A team that should finish 30 games below the best team, with the worst prospects, a payroll 5 times the min, and the smallest market would be 30*32*5*(32^.5) = BobbleValue of 27153.


tl;dr: Anywho, Marlins are a dumpster fire just like last season. I tried that in OOTP18 and didn't get too far. I think I'll try my hand at the Royals.

Thoughts? Disagree with the rankings?

Cod 03-14-2018 08:07 PM

I hope the Marlins' ownership group in the game is just as stupid as their real-life counterparts (shed payroll, raise ticket prices, etc.). Then I can start an expansion team in Miami and steal all their fans.

In all seriousness, I think the Mariners would be fun to play since they have the longest playoff drought in all of professional sports. On top of that, you have a pretty high payroll with no superstars that can put you over the top...so you're forced to make some moves (either rebuild or get cash for one big free agent).

Caporegime 03-14-2018 08:30 PM

It blows my mind that any team could have a lower payroll than the Marlins at this point, a team that's seemingly being held together by a strip of lint-riddled adhesive tape and a soggy gauze pad.

rjl518 03-14-2018 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caporegime (Post 4291858)
It blows my mind that any team could have a lower payroll than the Marlins at this point, a team that's seemingly being held together by a strip of lint-riddled adhesive tape and a soggy gauze pad.

Not easy being a Marlins fan down here.

NoOne 03-14-2018 10:24 PM

is the new owner any better?

or is he tighter than a ... <nsfw censor nsfw>

rjl518 03-15-2018 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoOne (Post 4291902)
is the new owner any better?

or is he tighter than a ... <nsfw censor nsfw>

well...lets see.
all of the good Marlins players have been traded away and now, the Marlins are a Triple AAA team playing in the Majors.
but, that being said, have to give Jeter some time.
we will let you know in a few years and a few losing seasons down here.
Good thing I'm a Mets fan first!

Cod 03-15-2018 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caporegime (Post 4291858)
It blows my mind that any team could have a lower payroll than the Marlins at this point, a team that's seemingly being held together by a strip of lint-riddled adhesive tape and a soggy gauze pad.

Roughly 50% of their payroll is on 4 mediocre (at best) players:
  • Martin Prado - $13.5 mil
  • Wei-Yin Chen - $12.6 mil
  • Starlin Castro - $10.8 mil
  • Brad Zeigler - $9 mil

Also, another 15% of their payroll is paying a Texas Rangers pitcher...Edinson Volquez ($13 mil).

itsmb8 03-15-2018 11:29 PM

I find it shocking that Milwaukee and Miami are still similar in payroll... Also, that 78-84 projected record is absolute BS IMO.

progen 03-16-2018 01:26 PM

Fightin Phils payroll will increase since they signed Arrieta to 25m/year for three years!

Bobble 03-16-2018 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by progen (Post 4292590)
Fightin Phils payroll will increase since they signed Arrieta to 25m/year for three years!

Yeah, maybe I'll update this weekend and repost. Thanks for the reminder.

Mr. Marlin 03-16-2018 03:38 PM

The rebuild of the Marlins was made necessary by two things, the trades from a dew years ago that brought Dee Gordon and two other guys who are no even playing affiliated ball any more for three prospects Hatcher, Hernandez, and Barnes, all reliable major leaguers now. Gordon is long gone so that's over. Nathan Evoldi and two other guys were traded for Marin Prado is is decent but I'd rather have Evoldi back. The drained the cream of the farm system for a team that won 150 games in two season because there is no depth left in the system Someone gets hurt and you're done.

Then Jose Fernandez died. They tried to replace him with Chen but he's done and overpaid to boot. There is exactly 0 major league talent playing above short season ball. And little enough at that level.

Add to that an ownership that has done every imaginable thing to infuriate the few fans that do come and the fish soup is pretty rotten.

So the new ownership has a choice, throw good money after bad (remember the team is some $400M in debt the day Jeter walks in the door) and maybe go from 77 wins to 85 (still won't get you there) or blow it up and start over. They made the right choice. The reason this has a negative connotation here is it's been done so often out of cheapness that no one here associates fire sales with future success. Everyone forgot already the end result of the Great Fire Sale of 1998 was the 2003 WS.

As for me, I'm cutting the new owners some slack. I'll still be there in my seat for every game this year, and next. But if another fire sale follows this one like that cheap b-----d Loria did over and over then I'm done.

Phatman 03-16-2018 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Marlin (Post 4292627)
The rebuild of the Marlins was made necessary by two things, the trades from a dew years ago that brought Dee Gordon and two other guys who are no even playing affiliated ball any more for three prospects Hatcher, Hernandez, and Barnes, all reliable major leaguers now. Gordon is long gone so that's over. Nathan Evoldi and two other guys were traded for Marin Prado is is decent but I'd rather have Evoldi back. The drained the cream of the farm system for a team that won 150 games in two season because there is no depth left in the system Someone gets hurt and you're done.

Then Jose Fernandez died. They tried to replace him with Chen but he's done and overpaid to boot. There is exactly 0 major league talent playing above short season ball. And little enough at that level.

Add to that an ownership that has done every imaginable thing to infuriate the few fans that do come and the fish soup is pretty rotten.

So the new ownership has a choice, throw good money after bad (remember the team is some $400M in debt the day Jeter walks in the door) and maybe go from 77 wins to 85 (still won't get you there) or blow it up and start over. They made the right choice. The reason this has a negative connotation here is it's been done so often out of cheapness that no one here associates fire sales with future success. Everyone forgot already the end result of the Great Fire Sale of 1998 was the 2003 WS.

As for me, I'm cutting the new owners some slack. I'll still be there in my seat for every game this year, and next. But if another fire sale follows this one like that cheap b-----d Loria did over and over then I'm done.

See ya there opening day. I’ll be behind home plate. :D

rjl518 03-16-2018 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Marlin (Post 4292627)
The rebuild of the Marlins was made necessary by two things, the trades from a dew years ago that brought Dee Gordon and two other guys who are no even playing affiliated ball any more for three prospects Hatcher, Hernandez, and Barnes, all reliable major leaguers now. Gordon is long gone so that's over. Nathan Evoldi and two other guys were traded for Marin Prado is is decent but I'd rather have Evoldi back. The drained the cream of the farm system for a team that won 150 games in two season because there is no depth left in the system Someone gets hurt and you're done.

Then Jose Fernandez died. They tried to replace him with Chen but he's done and overpaid to boot. There is exactly 0 major league talent playing above short season ball. And little enough at that level.

Add to that an ownership that has done every imaginable thing to infuriate the few fans that do come and the fish soup is pretty rotten.

So the new ownership has a choice, throw good money after bad (remember the team is some $400M in debt the day Jeter walks in the door) and maybe go from 77 wins to 85 (still won't get you there) or blow it up and start over. They made the right choice. The reason this has a negative connotation here is it's been done so often out of cheapness that no one here associates fire sales with future success. Everyone forgot already the end result of the Great Fire Sale of 1998 was the 2003 WS.

As for me, I'm cutting the new owners some slack. I'll still be there in my seat for every game this year, and next. But if another fire sale follows this one like that cheap b-----d Loria did over and over then I'm done.


Mr. Marlin
, you read my mind!

Mr. Marlin 03-17-2018 06:51 AM

Just as an example of why I think Bruce Sherman, Derek Jeter, and Mike Hill are doing the right thing, Fan Graphs has re-evaluated the Marlins player development organization:

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/97464...g&name=600x314

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/top-...miami-marlins/

So to answer Bobble's question and bring the conversation back on topic (since I'm the one that derailed it) The Marlins are not really that big a challenge. There will be no joy this year but if you are their GM and make a good move with Starlin Castro and JT Realmuto this season the future is bright.

I think the hardest team to manage would be the Tampa Bay Rays. You would be revenue challenged with a team that is good but not playoff good.There are nice pieces in AA & AAA but as soon as you bring them up you have to sell a veteran you won't be able to resign. It's like running on a treadmill. You are busting your butt but never getting anywhere.

Edit: Or the Seattle Mariners. Their window is closing and they will soon be in a rebuild. It would be a challenge to take a team through a rebuild over a few season and see what you can make of it. Not a team that is coming out of one like the White Sox, Padres, Braves, Phillies, etc.

Bobble 03-19-2018 08:56 AM

I'm no expert on the Marlins but aren't most of the assets gone? Not a great farm system, a fanbase that has to be rebuilt (and I don't think that's easy in OOTP or in real life), and a ML team that is ... not good. Seems like a very long play to get them to the top.

I can't see the Rays being too bad. They have something like 6 top 100 prospects and most of those are in AAA. That sounds like the core of a young, inexpensive, good team right there if you manage it right.

AllDayHalladay 03-19-2018 09:05 AM

Fangraphs had a good article breaking down why the Brewers projection is at 78W. The "average" projection is off by 6 wins if i remember correctly so just think of it as 84-78 instead haha

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/lets...re-projection/

5-4-3 03-19-2018 09:11 AM

GMing the Marlins is easy. Whatever you do, in the past, the present, or the future, is always going to be better what the real Marlin FO did, are doing, or will do.

LeiterFanatic 03-19-2018 10:44 AM

I could live with the rebuilding if I thought it would eventually turn into a decent ML team in a few years. But to still see that King D-Bag Marlins Man (not our own Mr. Marlin, of course) still behind home plate and wearing his obnoxious orange visor sideways at the Final Four and the Kentucky Derby is enough to make me leave and never come back.

what a putz

IanIachimoe 03-19-2018 10:55 AM

The Mets.

for me ;)

too emotionally attached to players I should have no problem dumping.

Bobble 03-20-2018 06:52 PM

3 Attachment(s)
To celebrate the change in direction for the Royals I'm planning to manage, I've decided that a uniform change is in order. I'm going with Tyrian "royal" purple instead of the blue.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments