Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Myers
Tosti posted a photo of <a href="http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=052435" target="_blank">Kid Murphy</a> on Oct. 9th <a href="http://www.ootpdevelopments.com/board/showthread.php?t=55000&page=172" target="_blank">here</a>.
Murphy was a turn-of-the-century flyweight, although there was no flyweight division then. Consequently I've rated him as a banty.
If someone else has already posted his ratings, I apologize.
<br>
|
Thanks for the rating ... I had created him myself as a 9 rated bantam and he had compiled a 15-2-1 record so far...... I am switching him to your rating and moving him to flyweight since I don't have very many fly's. He will probably be fighting for the very first flyweight title in the LBA sometime in 1910. I had also done Feltz but as I've said several times I put little to no thought into it when I rate guys ... I had Feltz as a 4.