OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

Jonzard · 11-01-2005, 12:41 PM

Can we say the same for the opposite? Does Randy Moss Suck? http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/player...s?statsId=4262

Hes on track for career lows.

My point is that every position on a football field depends on the rest of those around them. Sure, not having Randy Moss hurts Daunte, but to say "Daunte Culpepper sucks" is wrong. There are so many factors involved in a each player's success that attributing so much of it to simply the WR is something I disagree with. Hell, even the players on defense can make a QB look better. A team with a great defense gives the QB more time to work with and keeps an opposing team from keying on the passing game because the team always trails (like the Vikings this year).

11-01-2005, 12:41 PM	#8
Jonzard Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Minnesota Posts: 3,647	Can we say the same for the opposite? Does Randy Moss Suck? http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/player...s?statsId=4262 Hes on track for career lows. My point is that every position on a football field depends on the rest of those around them. Sure, not having Randy Moss hurts Daunte, but to say "Daunte Culpepper sucks" is wrong. There are so many factors involved in a each player's success that attributing so much of it to simply the WR is something I disagree with. Hell, even the players on defense can make a QB look better. A team with a great defense gives the QB more time to work with and keeps an opposing team from keying on the passing game because the team always trails (like the Vikings this year). __________________ For a scientist must indeed be freely imaginative and yet skeptical, creative and yet a critic. There is a sense in which he must be free, but another in which his thought must be very precisely regimented; there is poetry in science, but also a lot of bookkeeping. — Sir Peter B. Medawar FTB