Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skipaway
And you did realize the Montana case is weakening your argument, not strengthening it, since the change is minimal and you don't really have another side to compare it with. So you probably shouldn't have used it at first place.
|
I disagree. Any statistic has a level of significance, even if that level is low. So while it may not help a lot, it does provide one more example that fits the model. It certainly does not provide a counterpoint.
And yes, I pulled the Montana one out of my head when originally I just intended to talk about Moss and T.O...so I think it's kind of been a tangent.
Anyway, does anyone want to bet me $50 on whether McNabb finishes with a higher rating in 2005 than he did in any year without T.O.?
Does anyone want to bet me $50 that Collins does the same?
Anyone want to bet me about Culp...uh, wait