Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sebastian0622
Then all of a sudden Moss leaves and all of that falls apart, and I'm supposed to believe that's coincidental?
|
Now, I wouldn't say that it's unrelated, but I think it's putting too much stock in the fringe benefits of having a certain dominant reciever. I would very much doubt that losing Moss can attribute for any more than 50% of the collapse of Culpepper & Co... especially the OL.
Of course, I don't have anything really tangible to give you in defense of my position so I'm not expecting you to change your opinion by any means... Remember, though, corellation does not necessarily equal causation.