Quote:
Originally Posted by Skipaway
So maybe that huge differences in performances without Moss isn't about how Culpepper is really that bad without Moss, but how the team failed to recognize how much it was Moss, and adjusted in the wrong way which exposed Culpepper. The team might have thought Culpepper would be able to excute all those plays without Moss, which apparently could lead to more interceptions or more sacks.
|
I think anything that puts more of the Vikings struggles on the coaching staff is probably a pretty smart bet. Not to say a great receiver doesn't help a quarterback, but Mike Tice is a mo-ron.