Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sebastian0622
Links? I argue for my observation, but to think that I take this stuff seriously at all--well--we'll just say you don't know me too well. I'm more willing than almost anyone around to admit that I can be wrong on things.
People get so tied up trying to prove things "wrong" all of the time that they lose sight of the actual issue being discussed, then I lose sight of the issue because I have to counter those arguments.
And if someone does prove me wrong, then what's the point? So, I was wrong about something? Big deal. Not that I'm wrong about this anyway  , but if I am proven wrong down the line, big deal. |
If it's just an observation, why would you argue for it?
Nobody can deny that the ratings went up and down, and that's the observation part.
You insisted that the observation shows the up and down are all caused by those recievers, and that is NOT a observation any more, no matter how you'd like to call that.
That is called a theory.
And you tried to prove everyone saying you are wrong wrong! What exactly is the point, if this is just an observation? You wouldn't even acknowledge all the other alternative theories to explain this observation, and now you are complaining about how people are treating you? It's you that treated all opinions of other people poorly at first place.
Just an observation? Heh.