Quote:
Originally Posted by tysok
Sure why not... there's only 2 outs. The batter can sacrifice bunt like a mad crazy hungarian, he can't bunt for a hit at all...
but that runner on third passed home plate completely free and clear... and the batter executed his sacrifice perfectly.
The only good thing about that is the batter was the first baseman, so he doesn't have to run to his position now.
|
Yes, and people here argued that it DOES make sense to squeeze with two outs. I don't see how, as most squeeze bunts go directly back to the pitcher, which is an easy play to first. It DOES make sense to bunt for a hit in that situation (assuming you actually have the ability to do that), but that's not the same as a squeeze.