OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

terpsfan101 · 05-24-2010, 03:40 AM

I didn't even realize you were using "fake teams" in the 19th century. Is the two-league structure always necessary? Why not use all the real teams (except for the PL, UA, and FL). Change the abbreviations of the AA to AL, and NA to NL. If the two-league structure is necessary, I guess you could change 6 of the 12 NL teams from 1892-1899 to AL teams. Prior to 1882, change half the teams to the AL. Don't use any of the current AL franchises until 1901. In other words, keep all the lahman team and franchise ID's, just change the lgID's. I have no idea if any of this would work.

05-24-2010, 03:40 AM	#137
terpsfan101 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 31	I didn't even realize you were using "fake teams" in the 19th century. Is the two-league structure always necessary? Why not use all the real teams (except for the PL, UA, and FL). Change the abbreviations of the AA to AL, and NA to NL. If the two-league structure is necessary, I guess you could change 6 of the 12 NL teams from 1892-1899 to AL teams. Prior to 1882, change half the teams to the AL. Don't use any of the current AL franchises until 1901. In other words, keep all the lahman team and franchise ID's, just change the lgID's. I have no idea if any of this would work.