Thread: Contract Bug
View Single Post
Old 12-28-2011, 07:13 PM   #74
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSUColonel View Post
They may be under contract, but that doesn't mean the AI may not want to ofer an extension because the player is better than originally thought, or for minor league depth.
A player in his second season gets the biggest boost in current ratings ever seen in the history of OOTPB. It puts him on the fast track to MLB.

Your claim is that the AI is going to put him on waivers, no team is going to claim him (ie he has cleared waivers). Why did no team claim him? You then claim the AI must want to offer an extension to its own player who may not even be on the 40 man roster and is under control for 6 years minimum.

No contract ever needs to be offered. Why don't you show players with more than 6 years MLB service or minor league FA who are on waivers and maybe should get a contract offer. If this is such a serious problem you should be able to show such players.
__________________
Cheers

RichW

If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote