Quote:
Originally Posted by cheech411
Attachment 272130 please do this one ! SAW OTHER OPTIONS DIDNT LIKE PICS thanks!! this pic is larger then some pics that others have posted on this same page why doesnt mine work?? but that pic does ??????? MY PIC 300 x 475 OTHER PIC 180 X 270 am i missing something???
|
Because the question was asked publicly, I'll respond in public with what I have already described privately:
First as it relates to
Stallcup...the more detail in the photo, the longer and more difficult the colorization process. A head shot, like the
two Stallcup portraits I provided, will take a small fraction of the time to colorize compared to a noisy, full-length posed action shot with several shadowed areas. Knowing that you prefer not to use shoulder-up portraits, I also provided the full-length Stallcup in case Ortforshort has the time available to do a full-length colorization. I suggested that image because it's clearer, with a more favorable lighting source (shadows also require additional colorizing attention). If Ortforshort were to spend time doing a full-length colorization, this image may take less time than the image originally provided.
Next, the Mails and Hetki images...both of the provided images were "
squished." You cropped the picture, but then re-sized the photo in a way that did not maintain the proper aspect ratio. Those images are no longer accurate representations of the players, so I offered
"un-squished" versions.
When I see a low-quality photo (pixelated, noisy, improper aspect ratio or simply lower resolution when I higher resolution version is available), no matter who posts it, I provide an upgrade if I have one available. None of UK's posts fit those criteria. All of the images he posted are clear, as crisp as possible, large-format where available, and in the correct aspect ratio. There is absolutely no reason for me to offer alternatives to his posts.