Quote:
Originally Posted by justafan
Yes, sometimes there are conflicts between sportslogos.net and Colorwerx and I just choose one and go with it. It's not easy getting them perfect without a truly reliable source for the history of logos, and I don't think it's all that important either, it's just a game after all.
|
I'll agree that its annoying as all hell. I greatly appreciate that you post the franchise updates as you do them rather then just saying I've updated the franchises, guess which ones I did like the SSUR site does.
I guess I'm just a little more in the obsessive compulsive department when it comes to things like that, because I do try to get as close as possible to what it actually looked like.
I know just organizing your logos in the various folders I have and rechecking the color codes has already taken me close to ten hours total and that's just the work I've done with the logos.
I just do it when I get the time and I can tell you that its light years ahead of where it was seven years ago. Even in the mid 80's you would have roughly a third of the teams logos looking like garbage. Now there's a few logos in the 60's that still don't look so great but everything from 1972 on is near perfect and even going back to the 30's its more hit then miss in terms of how good looking the logos are.
I would love to see what this project will look like a year from now, especially if the pre 1950's keep getting improved on which I never expected to happen.