|
Like most theological arguments, this one will never end. I would like to add one observation: The discussion here has focused almost entirely on whether DH or no-DH offers more tactical options to the manager, but the American League didn't adopt the rule in order to improve or thwart strategizing, and, in any case, baseball isn't chess. We don't follow it for the sake of seeing brilliant managerial maneuvering.
The argument is ultimately about how much specialization the game should encourage. Hardly anybody favors going the way of football, basketball and ice hockey (effectively unlimited substitution and maximum specialization), but we've moved beyond cricket (no substitutions except for injuries and only limited bowler specialization). I tend toward the non-specialist side of the spectrum myself. It wouldn't bother me if the starting lineup had to play the entire game and no one could pitch more than three innings. But it's a matter of taste, and I know that I'm in as small a minority as lovers of lutefisk.
|