Quote:
Originally Posted by SodoMojo
While either pitcher is nice I think there is too much emphasis put on name recognition in a simulation game.
If you remove the names and just asked which scenario should I take:
Pitcher #1
18-9, 2.69 ERA, 311 K in 1998
or
Pitcher #2 & a solid reliever
17-11, 3.04 ERA, 251 K in 1998
I wonder if you would have gotten different responses.
That aspect alone had me switch to liking fictional leagues more which in the beginning I would have scoffed at the idea.
|
Not the case though because we can see into the future and know how these players can perform. If you can take an above average/good pitcher or the best pitcher for the next three years by a large margin which do you take?
__________________
Shootin' at the walls of heartache, BANG BANG, I am THE WARRIOR!
"It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am"- Ali
Wladimir Klitschko will DESTROY you.
|