View Single Post
Old 04-19-2015, 01:07 AM   #59
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by MKG1734 View Post
I really appreciate everyone takes to provide a quality, well-thought-out response. I also like that this has struck up a conversation between long-time players. I play the game, I believe, fairly and like you do, Sweed (treating it like a baseball game as opposed to only looking to 'game' the AI). The reason I posed the question that started this thread....was to have some outside opinions on what may be a loophole that I didnt even realize I was playing with that someone else saw.
Keep this in mind. I play a couple of leagues where I maintain a dominant dynastic position. I spend the most, leverage my success and seek out the best players every year. I don't set out to game the AI but I am not claiming sainthood in any way. I can often see value in certain players that the AI doesn't and I discard them the minute they slip. I expect to win the WS every year with the best WL record if possible. I don't. Each season I play as hard and as obsessively as possible to blow away the competition; not just winning but dominating everything. I don't cheat by editing players, making illogical trades, reversing injuries, low balling contracts or replaying a WS (someone here actually suggested this).

I just missed the playoffs for the 2nd time in 7 seasons and haven't won the WS in 4 seasons. In previous versions (didn't play this league v11, 12, 13), I could win 2-4 WS in a row no problem. Since v15 for sure the AI is formidable.

My position is that if I can play with an intent to dominate and not actually dominate the AI can't be that bad or maybe I'm not that good.
__________________
Cheers

RichW

If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote