Quote:
Originally Posted by MKG1734
Are you saying the game makes a decision like this as in it is programmed into the logic? To 'give a shot' to a player with high potential and then sit him when he struggles, as in it is almost a 'conscious' decision? That would be a remarkable programming feat.
The bottom line is:
Player A: 322 Plate App., .282 - .332 - .480
Player B: 203 Plate App., .228 - .266 - .394
Player C: 243 Plate App., .330 - .374 - .542
If the game is set up to play 'stats only' - why is Player B starting over either Player A or Player C? Its a legitimate question ... and understanding its answer will either help me understand what the game is doing or help me adjust a setting (but which setting?)
If the game is set up to play 'ratings only' - why is Player B starting over either Player A or Player C? Its a legitimate question ... and understanding its answer will either help me understand what the game is doing or help me adjust a setting (but which setting?) And if the answer to the 'ratings only' question is that 55 power vs 50 power trumps all the other ratings, I'm asking...doesn't it seem like maybe something (AI or manager setting) should be scaled a bit?
|
It's curious, you've never once mentioned the HR numbers for any of these players.
Do you know how the 20-80 scale works? 65 is a plus-plus power hitter. A lot of managers don't care if a plus-plus power hitter hits .230
No one has said that trumps all of their other ratings. I said that power is one of a lot of possible reasons why your AI manager with his own preferences and ideas wants to play a completely legitimate SS over another one.
Also, one thing I find funny? You're bitching that Baez plays over these other guys, when he has 40 less appearances than Russell and over 120 less than Alcantara in your quote above. It sure doesn't appear like that has been the case at all.