Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyzalot
|
You took my post which was in response to one made by Matt Arnold way out of context. You are entitled to your opinions but this thread is now verging into dishonesty. Show the context around my post and stop with the bull****.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Arnold
We always look to improve things. We had in our mind to make an extra look through player substitution logic, but essentially ran out of time. I think for next year we'll take another look to improve things.
But keep in mind, it's incredibly hard to get "right". If we shift guys around for a more optimal positioning, we'll get people complaining about the AI using too many bench players, or that they ended up shifting 3 guys for a marginal upgrade. There's definitely room for improvement, but so much depends on who's on field and who's available, we'll try our best.
|
Edit:
I was one of the leading advocates for changes in AI behavior that limits player movement. Again there seems to be a disconnect between players like me who prefer non-optimal but realistic player usage and strategy vs an unrealistic optimal AI.
There is a middle ground here but I suspect some posters are not interested in it.
__________________
Cheers
RichW
If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
Last edited by RchW; 05-10-2015 at 04:19 PM.
Reason: Added detail
|