View Single Post
Old 05-11-2015, 01:57 PM   #123
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by endgame View Post
I think he is looking for the blurred line. What elements of the prospect make the tilt toward more or less. What specific trait, rating, etc... would make one attractive under heavy, but not under favor, for instance.
Better prospects perhaps. I thought jdd's response was correct. It's impossible to parse the effect of these settings without the context that is only available in a particular league. At the top level if a proposed trade does not meet team needs then a negative response will have nothing to do with prospect favor settings. You could take it further and suggest that a certain mix of prospects could render both settings moot as all prospects or none may qualify at certain stages of each season and within the history of the league (ie low and high populations of prospects that meet needs)

One must respond to feedback received, not necessarily expect to know what form that feedback will be be for any particular league set up or current state..
__________________
Cheers

RichW

If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote