View Single Post
Old 03-26-2016, 11:51 AM   #113
risp2out
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 648
Jim Unknown is consistently too strong in historical minors. I have sampled historical minors in the 1920s, 1940s, and 1970s. So far, every Jim Unknown I've encountered has been a 4- or 5-star player, and often the best player on the team. J. Unknowns are necessary, but shouldn't they simply be a league average player? The result is that the AI will start name players, and then bring a series of J. Unknown pinch hitters in the 9th inning to mount 4- and 5-run rallies. Takes away from the immersion of this great feature.
risp2out is offline   Reply With Quote