View Single Post
Old 11-22-2016, 03:15 PM   #50
Spritze
OOTP Historical Czar
 
Spritze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bothell Wa
Posts: 7,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orcin View Post
(better IMO) reserve roster that will hold players in an organization when affiliates change is a great solution. This "reserve roster" could just be the designated for assignment list, thus prompting the player to assign the orphaned players or order the AI to do it. Players assigned to an independent team should still be "owned" by their historical parent organization.This is supposed to already work like this, any mlb team without milb teams is supposed to have an unlimited reserve roster.

I also agree that the historical minors database should be open to import players to their correct organizations or for a draft/free agent pool, if it can be done without creating duplicate players and still using the correct data for recalculating ratings each year using real stats. This is already supposed to work like this.

The important thing here is to make the game fun. Historically correct AND fun is even better, but we have compromises in a lot of areas. This could be another.
If the things above do not work properly perhaps they might be fixed in ootp 18 beta? For ootp 17 the milb beta team consisted of nobody at all, maybe this year it will have at least one member?
__________________
It's madness, madness, I tell you! For the love of God, don't do it!

Last edited by Spritze; 11-22-2016 at 03:16 PM.
Spritze is offline   Reply With Quote