Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOne
maybe try ratings relataive or not relative, depending on current setting...
maybe AI eval needs time to run and adjust? (stats part of overall).. only possible if first year, though... 2nd would be less prevalent, and 3rd, no problem by ~midseason or whenever enough data is accumulated on that 3rd year.
it's probably just rounding... 5stars is a very low resolution... even though they look like 2 stars, many are quite a bit different in ability. not referencing inaccuracy at all... only resolution of the scale. that's a neutral statement... many prefer a low resolution in the ratings. it definitely adds difficulty compared to a larger reso.
on the golf course we say "good from afar, but far from good" as you get a closer look at a group of women golfers  your eye's resolving power gets better and what looked amazing from 1000yds actually looks more like a man up close. *nowadays, the ladies say the same about me on the course (well, something similar, since i don't mind looking like a man, as i am one.) |
Thank you for replying.
You are probably right, stats. I have yet to run a season, heck....not even one game yet. My baseball Universe is brand-spanking new. I am still creating things after I built the template and am now putting caps and jerseys and logos to them all. That is when I noticed all the players having either 5 stars OR 1 1/2 stars. But just as you said, NO games have even been played yet, not even a spring training game, lol. That is how 'New' this league is. So....the scouts can not properly rate these players as they haven't even played single game yet, lol. DOH!!! lol....I believe you answered my question(s) even without knowing you did, hahahaha.
Thank you, mate!!! IO will report back in this thread should this persist.
