Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat
I am against setting your own ratings to AI eval. These should stay on pure.
|
i agree for my eye, that's what i would prefer to see, for sure. but, it only affects overall, which is mostly ignored anyway except by the AI. it doesn't change what you see for contact, control, all the individual ratings etc..
the AI is the main reason i use this option, because the game is built to use it. just like having injuries on, trading, scouting innacuracy etc... same reason most probably like things somewhere near default on ai eval., too.
i think off is a vallid setting for the discussion, but if oyu have not played with it on, it may be worth checking out.
i've played both ways. you probably won't notice a huge difference. Also, if you drop accuracy below normal, it becomes more important to include stats for the AI... a human can just 'do' it... the ai has to be told to specifically include this year and last or whatever (it varies the gm strategies around that setting -- they are not all robotically the same ai evaluation.)
in fact, i'd guess that if you play 100% scouting, the game probably works better with 100% ratings. otherwise you'd just be hamstringing the ai with less confident info to work with.