OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

NoOne · 02-17-2018, 06:20 PM

in theory, for sure.

more things go into hr/9 than just that, though.

for prospects withotu a mlb track record i'd stick to things like gb% and movement ratings... for a MLB vet i'd use their HR/9 with a large enough career sample and relatively consistent ratings during that window of time. (ie doesn't have to be entire career, i excluse rookie+ season all the time of developing mlb players -- it helps to retain scouting reports and not just 1/year.) RP/CL back to ratings, since they rarely amass enough innings in a window of tme that meets previous qualifications. they take more seasons due to use, and therefore more likely to change too much in that time.

stats are meaningless to add together if the underlying talent(real ratings) has changed drastically.

02-17-2018, 06:20 PM	#2
NoOne Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 7,273 Infractions: 0/1 (3)	in theory, for sure. more things go into hr/9 than just that, though. for prospects withotu a mlb track record i'd stick to things like gb% and movement ratings... for a MLB vet i'd use their HR/9 with a large enough career sample and relatively consistent ratings during that window of time. (ie doesn't have to be entire career, i excluse rookie+ season all the time of developing mlb players -- it helps to retain scouting reports and not just 1/year.) RP/CL back to ratings, since they rarely amass enough innings in a window of tme that meets previous qualifications. they take more seasons due to use, and therefore more likely to change too much in that time. stats are meaningless to add together if the underlying talent(real ratings) has changed drastically. Last edited by NoOne; 02-17-2018 at 06:23 PM.