[bradleycchurch]

Originally Posted by PSUColonel

I really think the default is good across the board. The only change I might make (and I am debating this myself) is whether the player evaluation settings should be 55/25/15/5 as opposed to the default 65/20/15/5.

The one thing to realize for this version though, is that stats are automatically taken into account. (based on AI evaluation) The option to not allow this is not present in this version...so it may be beneficial to heavily weigh ratings just as the default does, so unlike in year's past, 65 percent towards ratings is probably spot on...but I admit I still like a little more stats evaluation, but I am still sorting this out for personal preference.

Trading is good this year, I am seeing a lot more trades that make sense for the offering teams. Right now I am going on average difficulty unless I for some reason feel the need to up the difficulty to hard.


Other than this, ratings being relative should be default (something I do recommend) and if it is not, I might change this setting.

I still like realistic injuries, and I do employ realistic service time limits as well.

Other than this most things are really personal preference but everything is working very well IMO. I use inflation from year to year, and I also change market sizes, but again, this is all personal preference and doesn't change or affect the way OOTP operates on a realistic level.

I think the development and aging modifiers are spot on...thought I will want to see how that works with me upping the injuries to high, as normal (OOTP classic) is the default.

Would you still put AI at “favors prospects” after trade difficulty or leave as is?