|
If players are overmatched or not challenged, they'll also not develop as well, right? But on what basis does the game determine if they are at the right level? Is it their performance outcomes, which may be affected by luck in terms of temporary slumps or hot streaks? Or is overall current ability? And if so, would that mean a very strong defensive player would do better at a higher level even if his hitting wasn't quite as good? Or is it something else?
I don't know if I should just try to follow the coach's recommendations, since I don't know what they are based on. Maybe they should be trusted if there's 100% scouting accuracy, but otherwise can be subject to scouting inaccuracy.
I also wonder if I suffer a little disadvantage because my team doesn't have a short season A, so players have to make a bigger jump up from rookie leagues, increasing the chance that they suffer a penalty from be farther from the ideal level. Or is the acceptable league level range quite broad?
|