|
just as before, sure.
you will have to make choices about who gets how much... even distribution or not etc etc...
depends on those choices, i'm making assumptions based on what you wrote:
use market sizes and change local media contract value -- disproportionately helps the larger markets. (there's an option to make both local and national even for all too, but default should be static nat'l, dynamic on the local)
you can also change any of the revenue streams as you want. if you go the market size route above, make sure yo have a 10+ market (team settings).
obviously, things like gate revenue will help more successful teams in the moment than losing teams.
you could also reduce expenses. excess revenue will result in people getting paid more for the various jobs -- players and personnell. the players will get the bigger chunks, of course, but if all teams have excess revenue, they will spend above baseline for 'baseline-quality' coaches and such too.
since you don't have to worry about player contracts, you shouldn't have to worry about ramifacations of any imbalance too much. whatever you do, you may want to zoom out enough years for teams to turnover and spot check any problems on the finance reports or team front offices.
bottom line is that you can control every single revenue stream and expense to some effect.
|