[QuantaCondor]

Originally Posted by allenciox

Ok, based on these posts, my guess is that the top half of a particular rarity is less likely than the lower half.

So the indication that the rarest cards were all in the top half of the diamond level could be explained either if that top half were less likely than the bottom half, or if there were far more cards in the top half than the bottom half.

However, the reverse appears to be the case. There are a total of 307 cards rated 95 - 99, but 376 cards rated 90-94. So the indication that the most rare diamond cards are in the top half (fewer to choose from) solidifies the case that these are sampled less often.

Interesting, I stand corrected. The quality of these 95-99 historical cards really is a step above the lower 90s cards, so it makes sense. I wonder if this is also true for lower rarities.