Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandviper23
As someone new to the OOTP, I'm constantly trying to improve my understand of the game. Besides reading threads in this forum, I also study what choices my opponents are making who are having better success than myself.
One strategy I keep seeing is that they are putting players who have 0 training at positions and it doesn't seem to effect anything.
Example A.) If you play this player at SS during a Tournament, what are you risking?
Same manager put this other player at 3B.
By my noob understanding is if I did this, then I'd have my whole left IF with 0 training and that seems like a disaster but in this 7 game tournament series it seemed to have no consequence for my opponent doing it.
What am I missing? |
From what I understand, rating at that position is just a factor of infield ratings * experience at that position.
Someone with those individual skills isn't going to forget how to field because you shifted them from SS to 3B - they just won't perform to the level they would if they had experience at the position.
I could be wrong, but that's just what I've come to understand.