Quote:
Originally Posted by TomVeal
Unless man-decades of analysis and mega-hours of computer time have been devoted to a game with relatively simple rules (chess, checkers, backgammon - go is apparently still too much of a challenge), AI will be barely competent at best. I've played plenty of computer games that any human can win the first time he plays.
.
|
:You are woefully behind the times. Chess grandmasters need pawn and move odds to be competitive with AI and they still lose. Many of these programs are free and run on any computer, supercomputer not required. The last match between computer and human in go ended 4-1 in favor of the computer. Subsequently, that computer program lost a match 100-0 to a better program.
The point is, a baseball AI could be made so that you would rarely win even on easy level, but would that be fun?