View Single Post
Old 04-27-2021, 01:53 PM   #12
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketsAintFull View Post
Of course hitters need to adapt, but it's also fair to question at what point shifts go beyond the 'spirit' of the game - a subjective thing, sure, but 3 OFs & 4 IFs is quite strongly tied to baseball.

Also not sure why the game *shouldn't* have players like Bruce? Surely more variety of player types is a good thing?
The shift has been around since the 20's where Cy Williams was the target. It also seems to me that in the 20's if a shift was put on other batters would immediately counter and hit away from the shift. That adaptability is likely why shifts were underused for several decades until a sufficient number of hitters refused to adapt in modern times.

In my opinion if teams, batting coaches and hitters adopted a "break the shift" approach and stuck with it for 2-3 weeks they could dilute shifting enough to create additional risk for the defense. Right now there is little risk which is why the strategy to no surprise is apparently overused.
__________________
Cheers

RichW

If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote