Quote:
Originally Posted by oomm
Thanks for the link. Am finding many links (as in virtually all) are broken now.
However, though I haven't reached the end of the discussion there, there hasn't been any direct discussion of ratings percent representing a basic culmination of past performance (particularly performance beyond 2 seasons ago). And this remains my question: does not the ratings percent reflect the broader, general career performance? Because, otherwise, the game would be blind to performance prior to 2 seasons ago. Which wouldn't seem to work too well.
Therefore, again, following the above premise-- 25/25/25/25 appears to flatten everything. By 'flatten' I mean it makes everything equal to the other. For example, say it's a 10 season career in question: 2 years ago would be given same weight to this year and last year and the culmination of 10 years.
If that doesn't 'turn it off' what am I not understanding?
|
This is not true because different staff members value things differently also. What it does do is take out the artificial emphasis of one area over another.