|
All of the above and in combinations that are very dependent upon other factors.
For instance, have a groundball pitcher in a park, or era, that suppresses home runs somewhat, good stuff and control with average or below average movement should work out fine.
Have a flyball pitcher in a park or era where home runs are plentiful, might be good to emphasize movement more.
Experienced pitcher with good track record who has elite control and very good movement but underwhelming stuff? In my experience, this usually plays for at least a few seasons until the stuff gets so bad that performance falls off a cliff.
High stuff, good movement, poor control pitcher who induces a lot of groundballs and with a good infield defense behind him? In my experience, he can often work around his bouts of poor control and limit the damage.
What is the statistical environment like? What are your home park effects? How many pitches does the pitcher have in his repertoire? What are they? What is the quality of each pitch? What is your team defense like? Etc., etc.
In other words, I don't have a preference because that risks over-simplifying complex relationships and variables. So, as with most things, it depends.
|