Just wanted to follow up on these, as I find this subject very interesting
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaseballMan
I am still using ootp23 as it makes historical play for 19th century leagues with real rosters so much easier.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehef
What has changed? Not at all doubting you. I'm just curious what's different.
|
... and...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukas Berger
We've never had the correct 19th century historical teams in OOTP by default in any version of OOTP, because the engine does not handle contracting teams, which happened so often then, terribly well. This is not new to OOTP24.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehef
Hey Lukas, how specifically does OOTP not handle contraction well? Is it less because of the teams contracting as it is the start up and folding of leagues, or? I'm wondering because the amount of minor league teams & leagues starting and folding in the 1919-1960's range is flat-out staggering, yet OOTP handles all of that just fine (as far as I can tell, anyway).
|