OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

HRBaker · 06-16-2023, 02:38 PM

I've got three teams, one PT+ and two regular F2P.

The chart below shows comparable results between the PT+ team (Baltimore) and the most successful of the other two (Akron). Other than a quicker start by the PT+ team, things have settled out by Week 11, and ironically, it looks like Akron will return to Diamond next week while Baltimore remains in Gold.

In terms of missions, PT+ (Baltimore) has given me a lot more mission completions, but those completions haven't resulted in enough card improvements to make the team much better than Akron (non PT+).

I guess what I'm concluding (at this point) is that PT+ gives us a "small" advantage, but questionably justified for $7 a month (I purchased 6 months). Granted, I've had some luck with the Akron team - and my 3rd team (F2P) is struggling to stay in Bronze - but I was expecting a bit more out of a $42 investment

Thoughts?

06-16-2023, 02:38 PM	#1
HRBaker Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 2,312	11 week comparison... I've got three teams, one PT+ and two regular F2P. The chart below shows comparable results between the PT+ team (Baltimore) and the most successful of the other two (Akron). Other than a quicker start by the PT+ team, things have settled out by Week 11, and ironically, it looks like Akron will return to Diamond next week while Baltimore remains in Gold. In terms of missions, PT+ (Baltimore) has given me a lot more mission completions, but those completions haven't resulted in enough card improvements to make the team much better than Akron (non PT+). I guess what I'm concluding (at this point) is that PT+ gives us a "small" advantage, but questionably justified for $7 a month (I purchased 6 months). Granted, I've had some luck with the Akron team - and my 3rd team (F2P) is struggling to stay in Bronze - but I was expecting a bit more out of a $42 investment Thoughts? Attached Images __________________ *HRB* Last edited by HRBaker; 06-16-2023 at 05:45 PM.