View Single Post
Old 11-15-2023, 09:43 AM   #35
Brad K
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Hough View Post
This should absolutely not work this way. The development engine is supposed to be independent of real-life stats, but I just ran a test where I had Harvey Kuenn play a full season at LF, and even though the player editor says he now has an experience of 157 at LF, he still has no position rating there. His outfield defensive ratings did not change either. He has far more experience at LF than 2B, where he is currently rated, but OOTP has not added a positional rating for him at LF. It appears that OOTP has locked the resulting ratings for certain positions, so experience has no effect and cannot create a resulting rating.
I don't understand the example. You say dev should be independent of RL stats but you tested a player who has RL stats at the tested position.

For historical players I think they should be able to be trained to play any position they played anytime in RL at any time in OOTP. I don't like it at all that Caesar Tovar loses his IF ratings at a point then gets them back later. However a player who never played a position category RL should not always be able to do so under dev only. Perhaps most of he time he should not.
Brad K is offline   Reply With Quote