View Single Post
Old 02-26-2024, 12:14 AM   #4
luckymann
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 12,544
Great points, chaps, and thanks.

I encourage some variance, in fact I'll tolerate a moderate amount.

In my original post over on the historicals, I didn't request changes be made. What I'd like to know, as I posted over there, is whether changing my AI eval settings to reduce the weight of ratings on how the engine deploys these guys will help reduce in any way the predominance of career MiLBers - especially pitchers - in that save.

I have already ticked them down from 52/26/16/6 to 50/30/15/5 but it's too soon to see if this helps or hinders and it is tough to tell anyway unless there's a massive and obvious shift.

If this is the right course of action, I'll do it more aggressively again in the next offseason, I was thinking to 45/35/15/5.

But I'd dearly like to know if this is the right or wrong course of action, or neither, before doing so.

Thanks

G


Oh, and Charlie, the save in question was created in v24 in October last year, so about mid-release. 3-year recalc with dev on.
__________________
HISTORICAL DO-OVERS

PIRATES

A'S

RED SOX

DODGERS



CUSTOM SAVES

ECLIPSE LEAGUE MOON SHOT LEAGUE EVERYMAN LEAGUE

Last edited by luckymann; 02-26-2024 at 12:15 AM.
luckymann is offline   Reply With Quote