Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad K
Eugene, nobody has done quite what you are doing. Any advice is a guess. Maybe an educated guess but still a guess. Plus there's the issue of there being some question of whether adjust and weaken worked in the past the way Garlon has described. If he's wrong then entering the higher numbers is a change.
The ajust and weaken feature is to compensate for data that is unrealiable due to small sample size. So a guy as a one year career with 200 ABs and he's not adjusted on one year ratings. But he's highly adjusted if five year is selected because the standard for no adjustment is 1000 ABs. How does this make any sense? If 200 is good enough for one year it's good enough for five year.
This is why I suspect 24 and back were what you see is what you get, no multiplier behind the scenes and that using Garlon's method is a change. The devs have been completely silent on this despite multiple threads and Garlon has gone into hiding. I'm not saying my analysis is right but this sure looks like a ignore it and hope it goes away situation. Somebody screwed up.
|
Thank you for your help and advice... I apologize to all of you guys for sorta highjacking the the thread... what you are discussing is more important than my unique league... still my unique league is related somewhat to this thread.