Quote:
Originally Posted by jcard
Personally, I would recommend an option where when the threshold was not reached in the default recalc period, the game tried to backfill the shortfall by progressively drawing from additional surrounding years. This would be to the benefit of players who were established MLB players with a track record who happened to have missed a lot of time during the default recalc period (particularly for one-year recalc).
|
Isn't that the point of 3 or 5 year recalc then? There's a balance to strike of what you want and what you get out of OOTP, especially when you start considering individual players over the collective. We have the ability to edit individual players to adjust to our liking.
Quote:
|
"Pitcher ratings are adjusted to sample size, so a pitcher with 100 AB in a season, even if he performed good, will be rated lower than a position player with 600 AB and the same stats" - that this is by design
|
.
Does this apply to "two-way players"? These guys must be "identified" differently than good-hitting pitchers.