Thread: Mets
View Single Post
Old 06-09-2024, 03:58 PM   #2589
Westheim
Hall Of Famer
 
Westheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 12,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazin69 View Post
Well, that was a pleasant surprise.

Good thing the Mets "put up a four-spot" in the top of the 9th, per Michael Kay. (The Mets actually only scored 3 runs, helped out by the 1-4 batters only managing Pete getting plunked and a PB, but Michael Kay has only spent decades doing this job, so we can't expect him to know how to count to 4, after all.)

Mets had a 92% win probability heading into the bottom of the 9th. Looked more like a 9.2% chance for a while there, but even long shots come home.
Admit it, the Mets winning on a heads-up defensive play was quite the shocker!
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 89 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here!
1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055 * 2061
1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO

Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.
Westheim is offline   Reply With Quote