Quote:
Originally Posted by Déjà Bru
"Open-wheel"? Versus "Closed-wheel"?
|
Technically yes, although "closed-wheel" is a term that nobody really ever uses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Déjà Bru
"Purpose-built" I think I get. Built for the purpose of racing versus "stock car", I believe. A stock car is "an automobile that has not been modified from its original factory configuration" which even to this uneducated mind comes off as a crock. NASCAR cars look a bit more like my car, but that's it.
|
The NASCAR Chevy etc. only looks a bit like your car though. There's not a screw in that #24 Axalta Chevy that would also be found in your car. Stock cars haven't been stock in at least 50 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Déjà Bru
I looked up "rallying": Rallying is a wide-ranging form of motorsport with various competitive motoring elements such as speed tests (sometimes called "rally racing" in United States), navigation tests, or the ability to reach waypoints or a destination at a prescribed time or average speed. Rallies may be short in the form of trials at a single venue, or several thousand miles long in an extreme endurance rally."
|
Not sure about navigation tests and the like. This is
rally racing; there's also rallycross, which pits cars directly against each other on short dirt tracks, but I know very little about either one.
In general, you still want to be fastest. Everything else sounds a bit like a novelty to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Déjà Bru
None of NASCAR, IndyCar, or Formula 1 is like that; the fastest car wins. I ran across this article that points out the difference between Rally Racing vs. Circuit Racing (which includes NASCAR, IndyCar, and Formula 1, I believe). Thus Rally could have been a fourth branch of auto racing that I could have asked about, yes?
|
Yeah, but it's not a very big branch these days. I can't tell you all that much about it though, I never really watch any of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Déjà Bru
Heh, now a rally stock car may really resemble my car if this picture is at all typical.
Attachment 1068310
So, NASCAR is a separate beast but I am under the impression that IndyCar and Formula 1 are of the same species. I remember when I asked in the Forumula 1 thread about the Indianapolis 500, you were decidedly dismissive. Indeed, it's like PGA and LIV only that the newer Formula 1 has surpassed the older IndyCar, unlike the golf situation (yet). Agree with this assessment?
|
My answer was not supposed to be dismissive. From 1950 to 1960 the Indy 500 was part of the F1 world championship - for reasons that are genuinely hard to explain these days. At no point were the two series even run to the same car/engine specifications, and there was hardly any "cross-pollination" between the F1 and Indycar circuits in terms of drivers from one camp competing with the other.
Formula 1 is also far older than Indycar. F1 has been around as a championship since 1950, with a precursor in the interwar "European Championship" that was run in the 1930s. Indycar was only founded in the 1990s as a breakaway series from CART (which has since gone under); even though there has been some sort of continuity back to WW2 in the top-level of American open-wheel racing - although governing bodies (AAA, USAC...) have come and gone.
I know nothing about golf, as it bores me to absolute death, so I can't answer any PGA/LIV questions.