|
I’d advocate for it in order to create computer GM’s that are more realistic and diverse. As is, this is clearly one of the game’s weakest links. Computer GM’s make many poor decisions and are trivially easy to exploit. Also, every computer GM evaluates every player more or less the same. In real life, for example, a consensus future value 45 prospect would be graded as a 35 by some evaluators and a 55 by others. You don’t see this kind of diversity of opinion among computer GM’s. There are many more examples.
|