|
||||
|
![]() |
#1 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 103
|
Scouting Potential wording
Not hating on Charles Hudon but ...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
FHM Producer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 17,255
|
What star ratings are you seeing for the potential for Lafraniere and current rating for Hudon in your game? That line should be generated by a direct comparison of the former to the latter, and from the following one it seems like Lafreniere's potential is being read correctly, so something's either up with the comparison formula or Hudon has an extremely high talent number for some reason.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 103
|
5* vs 1.5 *
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
FHM Producer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 17,255
|
Well, that's not it, then. But I do see it working correctly when I look at a few different saves, so it doesn't seem to be a case of just having the comparison reversed. Could you upload the save? That may tell us exactly what's going wrong.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 103
|
Uploaded on your ftp server named Scouting_Potential_wording.zip.
I traded away Hudon to see what it would do and it's now saying the following, Kemppainen is 2* |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|