8th and 9th hitters sac bunting

bababui · 04-04-2007, 12:26 PM

I have run across this 3 or 4 times where the 7th hitter singles and the 8th hitter sacs him over to 2nd and if the pitcher hits next he will also sac bunt.

Spritze · 04-04-2007, 03:31 PM

This can be adjusted at the team level by lowering the sac slider or at the player level in the same way.

What is your team sac level set to?

bababui · 04-04-2007, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritze

This can be adjusted at the team level by lowering the sac slider or at the player level in the same way.

What is your team sac level set to?

I play out the games...its the opponents AI thats doing it

Curtis · 04-07-2007, 02:56 AM

You do alot of historical, bababui. What time period are you in?

During the deadball era double sacrifices like these were pretty common. I even remember them occaissionally during the 'second deadball' era of 1969-1974. They were common enough to notice, but uncommon enough to leave an impression.

This is NOT something you should see 1946-1968 or in the modern era.

04-04-2007, 12:26 PM	#1
bababui Hall Of Famer Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 14,147 Infractions: 0/1 (1)	8th and 9th hitters sac bunting I have run across this 3 or 4 times where the 7th hitter singles and the 8th hitter sacs him over to 2nd and if the pitcher hits next he will also sac bunt. Last edited by bababui; 02-25-2008 at 12:04 AM.

04-04-2007, 03:31 PM	#2
Spritze OOTP Historical Czar Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Bothell Wa Posts: 7,253	This can be adjusted at the team level by lowering the sac slider or at the player level in the same way. What is your team sac level set to?

04-07-2007, 02:56 AM	#4
Curtis Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Watertown, New York Posts: 4,567	You do alot of historical, bababui. What time period are you in? During the deadball era double sacrifices like these were pretty common. I even remember them occaissionally during the 'second deadball' era of 1969-1974. They were common enough to notice, but uncommon enough to leave an impression. This is NOT something you should see 1946-1968 or in the modern era.