|
||||
|
|
FOF - General Discussions Discuss the upcoming Front Office Football by OOTP Developments here. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South of Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,092
|
Good news!
Hey guys, good news! I got sick of all the speculation and messaged Marcus himself and he said the game is still in development and an update is coming soon! So let's have faith!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 416
|
I think a chat between Markus and Jim who makes Front Office Football would be good. The last update from Jim on their forum seemed to suggest he was trying to find a better way to develop the interface and that at the moment he was struggling to update his game or there might not be more versions.
FOF with the OOTP interface and facegen would be an incredible game. I have bought a few versions of FOF and love the game but hate that flipping interface. http://www.solecismic.com/frontierbl.../brief-update/
__________________
FHM Tester Matt LeClair - Penfold (1975-2015) |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 68
|
I'm really hoping this means some solid progress on the game and maybe a sneak peak at some screenshots or something. From my watching of this forum since the announcement of the game, this has been a patient and dedicated group of people supporting OOTP in their efforts to produce this. Which brings me hope that they might give us something in return. Fingers are crossed here
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Bat Boy
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
To see Jim and OOTP come together would be so great. The product is there is already solid and adding all the bells and whistles of an OOTP interface would probably bring in new people in droves. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 442
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: GM Games
Posts: 537
|
I would have to agree that there is a real need in this space. I think having 40,000 views (exactly 38,392) on the BTS Football preview page alone ( http://gmgames.org/beyond-the-sideline-football-bts/ ) is a solid indicator that the game will sell well.
But to be honest, if the first impressions don't go well, even though sales will, it'll be a steep road to winning back confidence. If OOTP needs time, then let them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: GM Games
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
I think for Jim to blame the UI is not the only need over at Solecismic. He needs a vibrant social media team, a modern forum and the things Brad Cook brought by connecting the business to customers. Jim does need user experience, graphics and UI upgrades but he also needs to put a little more work in to get the word out. If he isn't aware how, find someone who will. Last edited by trident; 04-19-2017 at 10:19 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,553
|
The UI for FOF is outdated but it's far from the only reason I don't play that game. FOF is neat if you want to play a single team as a GM in a modern-looking league or if you want to be a part of a PBEM league, and that's pretty much it. There's just zero customizeability the way there is with OOTP or FM or even the Wolverine Studios suite of games. You can import real rosters or you can use (pregen) fake players and... that's really about it. There's also very little depth to the game outside of the stuff that directly impacts your being a GM. Coaching, frankly, is kind of a joke - the game replaces AI and a strong knowledge of how to counteract football strategies with "the defense seems familiar with this play", and, weirdly, I think that Football Mogul's coaching system is actually more robust. The worst thing about this is that Jim Gindin's been making this game since the late 1990s - even at one point getting a bit of a financial boost from EA (I think they were going to include FOF in one of the versions of Madden in the early 2000s) and, time or no time, a lot of this stuff could have and should have been expanded upon. But it never did and in some ways the first couple iterations were actually *more* customizeable (forex you could expand the league) than the current one.
I have high hopes for BTS, and while I'm OK with the notion that not everything that I want in a game is going to be there in the first go-round, I also think there comes a time when you just have to say "ok, this game does what this guy wants it to do and that's just not what I want".
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 2,685
|
Quote:
I've long thought that OOTP/FOF would be a perfect pairing. OOTPD wouldn't have to reinvent the wheel to try to create a brand new football sim to compete with a game that has been in development for years... and FOF could get a huge push in areas where it is especially weak: PR/marketing, UI, customization. I'm almost certain whatever percentage of sales Jim would have to give up to OOTPD would be more than made up for by the fact that he'd have a team of people working to improve the game, get the word out and promote it once out. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 352
|
No
Quote:
*off rant
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by vulcan4; 04-23-2017 at 12:18 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Troy, Mo
Posts: 6,252
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South of Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,092
|
I will say that the fact that they kept all of their currently active games in blue up at the top of the screen and they colored BTS the same color as Title Bout Boxing which has died does not make me feel very secure...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Hall Of Famer
|
Quote:
1. OOTP 2. Anyone with differing views than their own. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Guarding The Line
Posts: 1,220
|
Sounds like I will be playing FPS 97 one more time this fall.
__________________
"...If you want to look ahead to the bottom of the ninth, the Mets will be sending up Buddy Harrelson, Jerry Buchek , and Don Bosch, we'll be right back after this word from Rheingold Beer" The late great Lindsey Nelson |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
This blue color signifies not a status of games but the links to the news. So until there will be news about BTS, the old link will be white. But there will be no news until developers are ready, and nobody knows when they will be ready, besides God and themselves. So put that handkerchief away. |
|
![]() |
#16 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
And I thought I was the only one to feel this way...lol,,,,
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 538
|
It's unfortunate about FOF.
It has been the best American Football text sim on the market for the last what, 10 years? At any period during that time, including even now, Jim could take that franchise, develop the hell out of it, maybe bring on some help, and run away with that genre in the same way that OOTP has run away with Baseball and Football Manager has run away with soccer. No competitor seriously expects to catch those two franchises anymore. But FOF won't be one of those stories. Jim hasn't put in that kind of time, and it looks like he won't in the future. He's kept everything pretty much the same and it doesn't seem like he's got much passion for it anymore to me. In a couple of years, some other developer is going to surpass him, FOF will gradually peter out, and Jim will have missed out on a big chance to make a real career out of being an indy game developer. It reminds me of Baseball Mogul, which was once the leader in text-based baseball, and Ancient Domains of Mystery, which was once the leader in Roguelike Role playing games (Thomas Biskup, the ADOM dev, was viewed almost like a God in his heyday). I'm not a dev of that level and I don't know what the financial situations of those devs are like... maybe they don't need the money and don't care about the recognition. But unless they're millionaires and doing what they love, they have got to be, or will be, kicking themselves for letting their opportunities slip away. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 352
|
![]() Quote:
Back to your post... You posted - "It has been the best American Football text sim on the market for the last what, 10 years? At any period during that time, including even now, Jim could take that franchise, develop the hell out of it, maybe bring on some help, and run away with that genre in the same way that OOTP has run away with Baseball and Football Manager has run away with soccer. No competitor seriously expects to catch those two franchises anymore." I totally agree and I don't want to turn this thread into as a "let's bash Jim" thread, but what I will say is what you posted right there (esp the underlined part), IN MY OPINION, is where Pride got in the way and he just couldn't let anyone touch his baby/creation. I guess, in a way, you can't blame him; it IS HIS game/creation. If he doesn't want a better, much more dynamic and immersive American Football sim, he doesn't have to. He choose the Path he has walked with FOF. And yes, FOF will go down in PC 'txt'/sports management games as one of the best all-time. If not the entire length of its run, at least the first 4 or 5 editions it will. Towards the end (if it's truly the end for FOF with FOF 8), Front Office Football, while maintaining a great sim engine in regards to stats and in-game plays, etc., it's fallen flat and has become nothing more than a repeats of previous years - which isn't good news for those who prefer a Dynamic and/or Immersive style of gameplay. And NO.....I am NOT referring to 'Madden NFL' style graphics when I speak of or mention "Dynamic and Immersive" style of game; I could give two craps about that. 'OOTP Style' of Game and its UI' does me JUST FINE!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|