wrong data displayed in player profile

Zeyes · 06-25-2006, 11:20 PM

This is purely a cosmetic thing, but it might be nice to get it changed:

The section "Defensive Ratings" in the player profiles shows different ratings depending on the player's position, i.e. Infield Range/Error/Arm/Turn DP for infielders, and Outfield Range/Error/Arm for outfielders. However, for catchers it also displays the 4 infield ratings (which have no effect on catchers), when it's much more sensible to display Catcher Ability and Catcher Arm.

jbsnadb · 06-26-2006, 12:44 AM

These can be found under the "player ratings" tab.

Zeyes · 06-26-2006, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbsnadb

These can be found under the "player ratings" tab.

Of course, but why should it be necessary to switch to that tab only for catchers?

battists · 07-17-2006, 01:03 PM

This has been resolved in the next patch.

I should know, because hadn't even seen this, but I was already pestering Markus about it.

TT was 1774.

Thanks!

Steve

06-25-2006, 11:20 PM	#1
Zeyes All Star Reserve Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 818	wrong data displayed in player profile This is purely a cosmetic thing, but it might be nice to get it changed: The section "Defensive Ratings" in the player profiles shows different ratings depending on the player's position, i.e. Infield Range/Error/Arm/Turn DP for infielders, and Outfield Range/Error/Arm for outfielders. However, for catchers it also displays the 4 infield ratings (which have no effect on catchers), when it's much more sensible to display Catcher Ability and Catcher Arm.

06-26-2006, 12:44 AM	#2
jbsnadb All Star Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,098	These can be found under the "player ratings" tab. __________________ "And as I wander with my music through the jungles of Despair, my kid will learn guitar and find a street corner somewhere. There he'll make the silence listen to the dream behind the voice, and show his minstrel Hamlet daddy that there only was one choice."

07-17-2006, 01:03 PM	#4
battists Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 18,506 Blog Entries: 7	This has been resolved in the next patch. I should know, because hadn't even seen this, but I was already pestering Markus about it. TT was 1774. Thanks! Steve