The Field Of Dreams Project

[Nick Soulis]

Series #249



Modern Power Survives Deadball Resolve
2003 Pirates Just Get By Deadball Cardinals



Series #249 — Game 1
Venue: PNC Park — Pittsburgh, PA
1908 St. Louis Cardinals 2
2003 Pittsburgh Pirates 0
Winning Pitcher: Bugs Raymond (1–0) — 6.0 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 4 BB, 4 K
Losing Pitcher: Brian Meadows (0–1) — 6.0 IP, 5 H, 2 ER
Save: Ed Karger (1)
Home Runs: St. Louis — Red Murray (1) Pittsburgh — None
Player of the Game: Bugs Raymond — 6 shutout innings, set the tone for the Cardinals’ Game 1 victory.
1908 St. Louis leads 1–0

The Cardinals of 1908 arrived at PNC Park as an enigma from another century, but by the end of the night they were simply the better team. Behind six masterful shutout innings from Bugs Raymond, St. Louis blanked the 2003 Pirates 2–0 to seize a 1–0 lead in Series 249.
Game 1 unfolded as a slow-burn duel, the kind of tense, low-scoring affair that suits a Deadball club perfectly. The first breakthrough came in the fourth inning when Red Murray jumped on a Brian Meadows pitch and sent it soaring into the right-field seats, a rare show of power from an era not known for it. Two innings later, Ed Konetchy delivered the decisive blow — a two-out RBI double that pushed the Cardinals ahead 2–0 and silenced the Pittsburgh crowd.
From there, the St. Louis pitching staff smothered every flicker of a Pirates rally. Raymond’s dancing, unpredictable offerings forced impatient swings and soft contact, while relievers Sandy McGlynn and Ed Karger stitched together the final nine outs with calm precision. Pittsburgh mustered only two hits, both from Kenny Lofton, and never advanced a runner past second base. In a park built for modern power, the Cardinals won with grit, guile, and an old-era understanding of pressure. The Pirates now look to regroup before Game 2, while St. Louis carries early momentum — and the comfort of knowing their style, at least for one night, translated across a century.

Series #249 — Game 2
Venue: PNC Park — Pittsburgh, PA
2003 Pittsburgh Pirates 9
1908 St. Louis Cardinals 1
Winning Pitcher: Jeff Suppan (1–0) — 6.0 IP, 6 H, 1 ER, 2 BB, 6 K
Losing Pitcher: Johnny Lush (0–1) — 2.0 IP, 5 H, 5 R (4 ER)
Save: None
Home Runs: St. Louis — None Pittsburgh — None
Player of the Game: Kenny Lofton — 4-for-5, triple, double, 3 R, 2 RBI, SB
Series: Tied 1–1

Game 2 unfolded like a thunderclap over the Allegheny, a complete reversal of the tense, minimalist duel that defined the opener. The 2003 Pittsburgh Pirates erupted early and never eased off, overpowering the 1908 St. Louis Cardinals 9–1 at PNC Park to level Series 249 at one game apiece. Pittsburgh seized control from the very first inning. After Kenny Lofton singled and stole second, Jason Kendall ripped a two-run double to ignite the crowd and tilt the field. Moments later, Morgan Stairs added another RBI, giving the Pirates a 3–0 lead before St. Louis had even settled into the night. The barrage continued in the second when Lofton tripled to right-center, then came home as part of another surge that pushed the lead to 5–0 and sent starter Johnny Lush to an early exit. From that point forward, the Pirates swung freely and ran confidently, fully embracing the power and pace of the modern game. The defining moment came in the sixth inning — a four-run eruption fueled by Lofton’s second extra-base hit, Randall Sanders’ RBI double, and opportunistic hitting up and down the lineup. By the time the dust settled, Lofton had assembled a masterpiece: 4-for-5 with a triple, a double, 3 runs scored, 2 driven in, and a stolen base. It was a performance that energized the ballpark and drowned out any lingering frustrations from Game 1. On the mound, Jeff Suppan gave the Pirates precisely what they needed: six efficient innings, six strikeouts, and just one run allowed. The bullpen — Sauerbeck and Lincoln — sealed the final three frames without incident. For the Cardinals, Red Murray drove in the lone run, but the Deadball style that thrived in the opener never took root. Falling behind early stripped St. Louis of its preferred tactics, and the Pirates dictated every inning from that point forward.

Series #249 — Game 3
Venue: Robison Field — St. Louis, MO
1908 St. Louis Cardinals 6,
2003 Pittsburgh Pirates 4
Winning Pitcher: Art Fromme (1–0) — 7.0 IP, 6 H, 4 ER, 3 BB, 5 K
Losing Pitcher: Kip Wells (0–1) — 2.0 IP, 8 H, 6 ER, 0 BB, 3 K
Save: Sandy McGlynn (1)
Home Runs: Pittsburgh — Brian Giles (1, 8th inning) St. Louis — Billy Byrne (1), Red Murray (2), Jack Bliss (1)
Player of the Game: Ed Konetchy — 3-for-4, double, 2 runs, RBI, central catalyst in Cardinals offense
1908 St. Louis leads 2–1

Game 3 at Robison Field felt like baseball slipping back into the century that shaped the 1908 Cardinals. The wooden stands, the tight alleys, the muted outfield gaps — all of it seemed to welcome St. Louis home. And once the game settled into its rhythm, the Cardinals played as though the ballpark itself had joined the lineup.
The Pirates struck first, scoring two early runs and attempting to bring the swagger of Game 2 into enemy territory. But the Cardinals answered immediately in the bottom half, matching Pittsburgh’s burst and calming the crowd’s nerves. The tone shifted from anxious to confident, and St. Louis never relinquished that momentum again.
In the second inning, Billy Byrne sent a deep drive into the left-field seats, a crisp solo shot that gave the Cardinals their first lead. It was a swing that seemed to wake the old stadium, and by the time the third inning arrived, Robison Field felt like it was leaning forward with anticipation. Red Murray opened the frame with a home run that brought the Cardinals dugout to life. Ed Konetchy followed with a sharp double, continuing a three-hit performance that defined his night. Moments later, Jack Bliss delivered the blow that shaped the rest of the game — a towering two-run home run that lifted the score to 6–2 and sent the St. Louis crowd into full celebratory roar. From there, Art Fromme took the game into his hands. He worked seven innings, not without turbulence, but always with enough resilience to keep the Pirates from clawing all the way back. His only significant stumble came in the eighth, when Brian Giles homered to tighten the margin, but Higginbotham and McGlynn steadied the final innings with quiet, efficient relief work. By the time the final out landed in a glove, St. Louis had collected thirteen hits and reclaimed control of the series with the deliberate confidence of a team playing exactly the style of baseball it was built for. The Cardinals now lead Series 249 by a 2–1 margin, and with Game 4 still at Robison Field, the balance of the matchup has shifted squarely into their era’s hands.

Series #249 — Game 4
Robison Field — St. Louis, MO
2003 Pittsburgh Pirates 5,
1908 St. Louis Cardinals 4
Winning Pitcher: Kris Benson (1–0) — 7.0 IP, 5 H, 1 ER, 3 BB, 4 K
Losing Pitcher: Fred Beebe (0–1) — 6.0 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 5 BB, 5 K
Save: Julián Tavárez (1)
Home Runs: Pittsburgh — Morgan Stairs (1), Reggie Sanders (1), Brian Giles (1)
Player of the Game: Kris Benson — 7 strong innings, set the tone for Pittsburgh’s road win
Series: Tied 2–2

Game 4 at Robison Field carried the feel of a long, coiled wire — quiet tension, steady pressure, and then a sudden spark that changed everything. The 2003 Pirates edged the 1908 Cardinals 5–4, evening Series 249 at two games apiece and stealing back a measure of control on the road. St. Louis struck first, using their familiar early-inning craft to scratch across a run in the opening frame. But while the Cardinals tried to shape the game into their preferred tight, small-ball design, Pittsburgh’s starter Kris Benson slowly unraveled that script. Across seven innings he worked with calm persistence, scattering five hits and allowing only a single earned run. His steady hand kept the Cardinals from ever settling into the rhythm they found in Game 3. The turning points came in increments, not outbursts — at least at first. In the fifth inning, Morgan Stairs jolted a solo home run into left, tying the game and signaling that Pittsburgh’s bats were beginning to adjust to the ballpark’s stubborn geometry. An inning later, Kenny Lofton worked a bases-loaded walk, giving Pittsburgh a 2–1 lead with the kind of disciplined at-bat that can break a pitcher’s backbone more effectively than a double in the gap. The game held that shape until the eighth, when the Pirates delivered the decisive blow. Randall Simon doubled to start the inning, a clean strike that forced the Cardinals to tighten their defense. Then Reggie Sanders, patient all night, jumped on a Higginbotham pitch and crushed it over the left-field boards. And as if Pittsburgh wished to remind everyone they were a modern team playing in an old park, Brian Giles followed with a deep home run of his own. Two swings, back to back, and suddenly Pittsburgh led 5–1. St. Louis refused to fold. In the bottom half of the eighth, substitute W. Murdoch ripped a two-run double that reignited the crowd and brought the Cardinals back within one. For a moment, Robison Field felt alive in that old, unruly way — the kind of energy that can tilt a game into chaos.
But Pittsburgh’s closer, Julián Tavárez, with his odd rhythms and awkward angles, found a way to stagger through the ninth without surrendering the lead. The Cardinals left the tying run on base, and the wooden grandstands, for all their historic stubbornness, fell silent.
The series now leaves Game 4 exactly as it entered — precariously balanced, impossible to predict. St. Louis has proved their era can still command moments; Pittsburgh has proved the modern game can break through anywhere. With the series tied 2–2 and one more game in this old park before returning to Pittsburgh, the tension is rising, inning by inning.

Series #249 — Game 5
Robison Field — St. Louis, MO
2003 Pittsburgh Pirates 1,
1908 St. Louis Cardinals 0
Winning Pitcher: Brian Meadows (1–1) — 8.0 IP, 6 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 2 K
Losing Pitcher: Bugs Raymond (1–1) — 8.0 IP, 3 H, 1 ER, 0 BB, 10 K
Save: Julián Tavárez (2)
Home Runs: Pittsburgh — Reggie Sanders (2, solo HR in 2nd inning)
Player of the Game: Brian Meadows — eight shutout innings in a pivotal road start.
2003 Pittsburgh Pirates lead 3–2

Game 5 at Robison Field felt like baseball stripped down to its barest, most unforgiving form — one mistake, one swing, one breath separating triumph from regret. In a game played entirely in the narrow margins, the 2003 Pirates outlasted the 1908 Cardinals 1–0, seizing the pivotal contest of Series 249 and pushing St. Louis to the brink. The night belonged to the pitchers, and they authored two entirely different masterpieces. Bugs Raymond was dazzling, spinning eight innings of three-hit, ten-strikeout brilliance. His spitball bent like something alive, forcing awkward swings and frozen stares from a modern lineup that had battered Cardinals pitching the previous two games. Raymond struck out the side in the third, danced around trouble in the fifth, and seemed to grow sharper as the innings grew heavier. It was the kind of performance that would be talked about for decades — if not for the one pitch that changed everything. Leading off the second inning, Reggie Sanders turned on a Raymond delivery and punched it over the wooden fence in left field. It was surprising not because Sanders was incapable of such a blow, but because Robison Field is notoriously stingy with home runs. The ball carried just far enough, just high enough, and just true enough to fall into a pocket of silence before the Pirates dugout erupted. That single swing — a rare flash of modern power in a Deadball space — became the game’s only run. On the other side, Brian Meadows pitched with quiet authority. He didn’t strike out many, didn’t overpower anyone, didn’t even allow a walk — but he kept St. Louis from ever finding the rhythm that usually carries their offense. Every time the Cardinals nudged their way into a small opening — O’Rourke’s double in the seventh, Murray’s hard contact in the eighth — Meadows calmly closed the door. His eight shutout innings were a clinic in restraint, timing, and trust in defense.
The Cardinals pushed one last surge in the ninth, the crowd humming with hope, but Julián Tavárez snuffed out the rally with sharp, jittering precision. Three batters later, the Pirates walked off Robison Field with a win stolen from the bones of a game the Cardinals felt they had controlled. A masterpiece for Raymond that ended in defeat; a quiet triumph for Meadows that may define the series.

Series #249 — Game 6
PNC Park — Pittsburgh, PA
1908 St. Louis Cardinals 4,
2003 Pittsburgh Pirates 1
Winning Pitcher: Johnny Lush (1–1) — 7.0 IP, 2 H, 1 ER, 3 BB, 3 K
Losing Pitcher: Jeff Suppan (1–1) — 6.0 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 3 BB, 5 K
Save: Ira Higginbotham (2)
Home Runs:
• Pittsburgh — None
• St. Louis — None
Player of the Game: Johnny Lush — seven innings of two-hit, one-run pitching in an elimination game
Series Tied 3–3

Game 6 in Pittsburgh unfolded with a quiet kind of intensity — not the explosive, momentum-swinging chaos you sometimes see in elimination games, but the steady tightening of a rope. And when it was finished, the 1908 Cardinals had pulled that rope taut enough to drag the series back to even ground. The Cardinals didn’t overpower the Pirates. They didn’t overwhelm them. They simply outlasted them — pitch by pitch, at-bat by at-bat, trusting the parts of their game that were built long before PNC Park ever existed. Johnny Lush set the tone from his very first inning. His outings can tilt dramatically in either direction, but tonight he found that thin seam between aggression and restraint. The Pirates couldn’t pick up his rhythm — soft fly balls, late swings, and uncertain takes filled the early frames. Before long, it became clear that Pittsburgh wasn’t just struggling to score; they were struggling to see Lush at all. Through seven innings he allowed only two hits, and when the lone Pirates run finally crossed, it came more as an interruption than a threat.
St. Louis didn’t give him much run support at first, but their chances came with a sense of inevitability rather than surprise. Jack Bliss broke open the scoring in the fourth with an RBI double into the right-center gap, the kind of swing that fits the Deadball identity — not majestic, but perfectly timed. An inning later, Ed Konetchy added a two-out RBI, part of his four-hit night that kept the Cardinals’ offense from sagging under the weight of so many missed opportunities.
The Pirates briefly stirred in the seventh when Reggie Sanders lined a run-scoring single, but that was as close as they came to shifting the game’s momentum. St. Louis answered in the ninth with two more Konetchy-driven insurance runs, and those final blows did more than pad the score: they reasserted control at exactly the moment Pittsburgh hoped adrenaline might carry them back into the fight.
Ira Higginbotham stepped in to secure the last six outs, pitching without panic, without spectacle — just enough to protect everything Lush had built. And just like that, a series that once leaned toward the Pirates now stands perfectly level again. Three wins apiece. A modern lineup staring down a team from 1908 that refuses to be outpaced, out-toughed, or out-thought.

SERIES #249
GAME 7
PNC Park (Pittsburgh)
Weather: Partly Cloudy, 48°, wind out to center at 8 mph
St. Louis 1908 Cardinals — 2 R
Pittsburgh 2003 Pirates — 6
WIN: Mike Lincoln (1–0)
LOSS: Art Fromme (0–1)
SAVE: Julián Tavárez (3)
HOME RUNS: STL — Konetchy (1), Murray (3) PIT — Stairs (2)
PLAYER OF THE GAME: Matt Stairs — 3-for-4, HR, 2B, 2 RBI, 2 R


Everything a decisive Game 7 should be—tight early, tense throughout, and ultimately claimed by the team that found its swing at the right moment—played out under the cool Pittsburgh night as the 2003 Pirates defeated the 1908 Cardinals, 6–2, to advance in Series #249.
For five innings, the game felt like a chess match of missed chances and quiet escapes. Art Fromme and Kip Wells matched each other with scoreless frames, neither dominant but both resourceful. St. Louis showed flickers of life—Rube Murray doubled, Ed Konetchy worked long counts, Jack Bliss stung a ball to the gap—but the Pirates’ defense and Wells’ bend-but-don’t-break rhythm held the line. Pittsburgh’s early traffic fared no better; ground balls died in the infield, and Fromme’s mix of fastball and soft spin kept hitters guessing.
Everything shifted in the sixth. One swing—Matt Stairs turning on a Fromme offering and towering it into the right-field seats—finally broke the deadlock. The blast energized PNC Park, and before the Cardinals could steady themselves, Pittsburgh added a second run on a Kendall double, giving the home crowd the surge it had been waiting for.
The seventh inning became the true turning point. St. Louis went to the bullpen, but the Pirates pounced. Tike Redman lashed a run-scoring double, Stairs followed with another extra-base hit, and Reggie Sanders punched in a run with two outs. By the time the frame ended, Pittsburgh led 6–1 and the stadium felt the finish line approaching.
St. Louis fought back with the heart that defined their run. Konetchy launched a solo homer in the seventh, Murray added another in the ninth, and the Cardinals continued to bring the tying run to the on-deck circle. But the Pittsburgh bullpen—Lincoln, D’Amico, Sauerbeck, and finally Tavárez—held firm. Tavárez induced a simple final out, and the Pirates completed their climb from a 3–3 series tie to a Game 7 triumph.
As the players spilled onto the field, it was clear that this was no fluke: Pittsburgh survived a century-old, relentlessly stubborn Cardinals lineup, weathered the lows and highs of a seesaw series, and delivered the biggest swings when the pressure tightened. Series #249 ends with the Pirates marching on—and St. Louis returning to 1908 knowing they had pushed this modern club to its absolute limit.

2003 Pittsburgh Pirates Win Series 4 Games To 3

Series MVP:

.458, 4 RBI, 3 2B, 3 R, .536 OBP, 1.119 OPS)

[Nick Soulis]

SERIES #250



1952 Boston Red Sox
Record: 76-78
Finish: 6th in AL
Manager: Lou Boudreau
Ball Park: Fenway Park
WAR Leader: Billy Goodman (3.8)
Franchise Record: 9-8
1952 Season Record: 0-1
Hall of Famers: (4)
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BOS/1952.shtml

1946 Washington Senators
Record: 76-78
Finish: 4th in AL
Manager: Ossie Bluege
Ball Park: Griffith Stadium
WAR Leader: Mickey Vernon (5.7)
Franchise Record: 4-14
1946 Season Record: 4-1
Hall of Famers: (2)
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/WSH/1946.shtml
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEAVENS DUGOUT — SERIES 250 PRE-SERIES SPECIAL



Panel: Bob Costas (host), Nolan Ryan, Dusty Baker, Grantland Rice
Matchup: 1946 Washington Senators vs. 1952 Boston Red Sox
Venue: Dyersville, Iowa

OPENING SEGMENT — “A Quarter-Thousand Series Later”



BOB COSTAS:
Welcome to a landmark moment. A quarter-thousand Field of Dreams series. Two hundred and fifty matchups played across decades, styles, temperaments, eras, and legends. Tonight, we begin another series—perhaps not between the most famous teams, perhaps not featuring the most decorated stars—but one that feels perfectly chosen for this milestone.

The 1946 Washington Senators—a club forged in the first quiet summer after World War II.
The 1952 Boston Red Sox—a team navigating life without Ted Williams, still proud, still dangerous, still stitched together with that Fenway stubbornness.

And with me for this milestone broadcast: Nolan Ryan, Dusty Baker, and the ever-eloquent Grantland Rice.

Nolan, start us off. What does Series 250 mean from your vantage point?

NOLAN RYAN:
Bob, reaching 250 series tells you this place has endurance. Ball doesn’t lie out here. Doesn’t matter what year you’re from—when you walk out of that corn and take the mound, the hitters don’t care what’s on your baseball card. I like this matchup because neither team comes in crowned. Both have something to prove. And for pitchers, this field asks real questions.

DUSTY BAKER:
Yeah, Nolan, I hear you. Baseball’s about rhythm, man. And when you get to a number like 250, that rhythm’s deeper. These two clubs—Washington and Boston—they come from years when the game was steady, not flashy. Hardball, straight-ahead ball. You see teams like this, and you feel the heartbeat of how baseball used to be.

GRANTLAND RICE:
In the slow dusk over Iowa, where time folds gently against itself, two teams come not as relics but as reminders. Washington brings the echo of a nation finding peace; Boston carries the tension of expectation unmet yet unbroken. This field is their equalizer. And as the shadows lengthen, both will discover that myth respects only those who earn it pitch by pitch.

COSTAS:
Poetry at the top of the show. Perfect.

SEGMENT TWO — “The 1946 Senators: Order, Restraint, and Return”

COSTAS:
Let’s begin with the ’46 Senators. Ossie Bluege. A quiet architect of stability. A team full of returning servicemen and players who understood what it meant simply to play baseball again.

Dusty—what strikes you about this club?

BAKER:
This team reminds me of every clubhouse that doesn’t have a superstar but has five or six guys who know how to win Tuesday nights. They don’t overpower you. They don’t scare you walking off the bus. But they execute, man. They bunt. They move runners. They play for one run, and then another. That makes them a handful in a seven-game series.

RYAN:
And they pitch fearless. You get a team built around execution rather than power, and pitchers start believing they can dictate the pace. Washington’s staff is steady. They won’t throw 100, but they’ll keep the ball down, and on this field, if you keep the ball low, those big innings get harder to come by.

RICE:
Washington arrives as if stepping out of a sepia photograph—quiet, composed, willing to endure. Their virtue is their constancy. And in a game where constancy wins more often than flash, they are more dangerous than memory suggests.

COSTAS:
Exactly right. They are not here as decoration. They are here as contenders.

SEGMENT THREE — “The 1952 Red Sox: Power in Waiting”

COSTAS:
Now, Boston. Lou Boudreau at the helm—one of the most intelligent baseball minds of the century. Williams absent, yet the Red Sox find themselves with structure, with edge, with professional hitters who grind out games.

Nolan—when you look at this lineup, what do you see?

RYAN:
Boston’s tougher than they look. They’ve got hitters who can hurt you even without the long ball. Fenway teaches discipline. They don’t chase. They wait for mistakes. And out here, with no Green Monster and a lot of open outfield, patience pays off big.

BAKER:
And don’t forget—they bring pride. Boston ballplayers always carry that chip. Doesn’t matter the year. They think they’re supposed to win. That attitude travels. You can hear it when they hit the field.

RICE:
Boston moves with the weight of lineage. Their uniforms alone tell stories. But this version—this 1952 incarnation—carries something subtler: the hunger not to repeat the familiar ache of almost. In that hunger lies their fire.

COSTAS:
They arrive with ambition. And ambition on this field often finds its chance.

SEGMENT FOUR — “Key Questions for Series 250”

COSTAS:
Let’s frame what this series may hinge upon.

Dusty—what’s the biggest tactical question?

BAKER:
For me, it’s whether Washington can keep Boston from stringing together innings. You let Boston’s hitters see a pitcher too clearly—they’ll time him. Washington’s gotta mix speeds, mix looks, keep ’em off balance.

RYAN:
Pitching depth. Period. On this field, teams can collapse fast if they’re thin in the middle innings. I want to see who’s got the reliever who comes out of the corn and shuts the door.

RICE:
And composure. Series 250 is a stage—an anniversary. The weight is different. Whichever club steps cleanly into the moment without trembling will control its destiny.

COSTAS:
Perfectly put. Pressure is a quiet participant in this series.

SEGMENT FIVE — “What the Milestone Means”

COSTAS:
Before we close, I want each of you to speak not about tactics but about meaning. Two hundred and fifty series. How should viewers—those who’ve walked with this project—feel tonight?

RYAN:
Proud. This place has seen great baseball. Tough baseball. Honest baseball. Reaching 250 means the game’s heartbeat is still strong out here.

BAKER:
Grateful, man. Baseball’s a people’s game. And every series is a story. You stack up 250 stories, and you’re building something no one else has. That’s special.

RICE:
The number is a beacon. It tells us the dream did not fade with the last light of the first summer. It endured. Like the game. Like the people who return to it, series after series, seeking nothing more and nothing less than truth in nine innings.

COSTAS:
Beautiful. Gentlemen, thank you.

CLOSING

COSTAS:
From the cornfields of Iowa, from this improbable stage, Series 250 is upon us. Washington. Boston. Two teams stepping into a milestone not because they were chosen—but because the field called for them.

First pitch awaits.

[Nick Soulis]

Series #250



“Where the Quiet Men Endure”
A Grantland Rice Reflection on Series 250



In the long annals of this game—where memory stretches out like a dusty road disappearing into horizon light—there come moments when triumph does not roar but whispers, steady and sure. Such was the tale of these six games between the Washington Senators of 1946 and the Boston Red Sox of 1952, a contest less about glory than about endurance, less about crowns than the simple right to journey on.

For two games, Boston held the stage, their bats singing beneath the Fenway sun, their confidence ringing as true as a well-struck line drive. But baseball has never pledged itself to the certainty of beginnings, and from the deep shade of adversity the Senators rose—first in a marathon of fifteen innings where heart outlasted fatigue, then in a string of steady triumphs forged not by thunder, but by patience.

There was Mickey Vernon, whose bat shone like a lantern through long extra frames. There was Stan Spence, lifting a grand slam that turned a once-inclined series upright. There was Johnny Niggeling, knuckling the ball as if coaxing destiny itself. And at last, Dutch Leonard, calm of soul and certain of touch, silencing a Boston crowd that had grown accustomed to its own prevailing.

These Senators did not conquer—they endured. They absorbed the early blows, steadied their resolve, and allowed the slow, even pulse of baseball’s ancient rhythm to guide their hand. When the final out drifted into their grasp, they claimed no laurels, asked for no banners, summoned no great celebration. They merely walked forward, as all pilgrims of this game must do, toward the next test waiting beyond the outfield grass.

For on this field—this strange, eternal field—victory is not a destination but a permission granted by the game itself: the right to remain, to dream, to step once more into the light.

And so Washington advances, quiet and unadorned, bearing with them the truth Grantland Rice believed with all his heart—
that baseball, like life, is seldom won by the mighty,
but instead by those who simply refuse to fade.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SERIES 250
GAME 1 — Fenway Park
1952 Boston Red Sox 3
1946 Washington Senators 2
Winning Pitcher: Mickey McDermott (1–0)
Losing Pitcher: Roger Wolff (0–1)
Save: Walt Masterson (1)
Home Runs: Clyde Vollmer (BOS) — Solo HR, 1st inning
Mickey Vernon (WSH) — 2-run HR, 1st inning
Player of the Game: Mickey McDermott — 8.0 IP, 5 H, 2 ER, 5 K, earned the win in the Series 250 opener.
Series Score: Boston leads 1–0

Game 1 of Series 250 unfolded as a taut, old-fashioned duel at Fenway Park, where the 1952 Red Sox outlasted the 1946 Senators 3–2 behind eight determined innings from Mickey McDermott. Washington struck instantly—Mickey Vernon’s towering two-run homer in the first gave the Senators a 2–1 lead after Clyde Vollmer had opened Boston’s scoring with a solo shot of his own—but that early burst proved to be the extent of their offense. Washington repeatedly put runners on, drawing six walks and collecting seven hits, yet stranded eleven men as McDermott bent without breaking, mixing fastballs and angles to escape every jam. Boston chipped away methodically: Vern Stephens’ steady contact, Sammy White’s spark, and finally Billy Goodman’s RBI single in the sixth, a quiet opposite-field knock that pushed the Red Sox ahead for good. Roger Wolff pitched valiantly across seven innings, allowing only six hits, but Boston’s efficiency and McDermott’s resilience defined the afternoon. Walt Masterson closed the door in the ninth, sealing a one-run victory that gives Boston a 1–0 lead in the milestone series.

SERIES 250
GAME 2 — Fenway Park
1952 Boston Red Sox 2,
1946 Washington Senators 1
Winning Pitcher: Mel Parnell (1–0)
Losing Pitcher: Dutch Leonard (0–1)
Save: None (Parnell CG)
Home Runs:
Dom DiMaggio (BOS) — 2-run HR, 3rd inning
Player of the Game: Mel Parnell — 9.0 IP, 5 H, 1 ER, 3 K, complete-game victory.
Series Score: 1952 Boston leads 2–0

Game 2 of Series 250 unfolded as a taut, almost suffocating pitchers’ duel at Fenway Park, where Mel Parnell’s complete-game masterpiece carried the 1952 Red Sox to a 2–1 victory and a commanding 2–0 series lead. Washington never solved the Boston left-hander, who scattered five hits across nine innings and calmly defused every rally the Senators mounted, inducing ground ball after ground ball to keep the game in his hands. The decisive blow came early: in the bottom of the third, Dom DiMaggio turned on a pitch from Dutch Leonard and sent it over the wall for a two-run homer, the only moment all afternoon when offense took the spotlight. Leonard was brilliant in defeat—three hits allowed over eight innings, only one earned run, and complete control of Boston’s lineup—but a lone error behind him and a silent Washington offense proved too much to overcome. Mickey Vernon’s two-out RBI single in the eighth finally put the Senators on the board, but Parnell quickly restored order and closed the door in the ninth. Boston’s precision, patience, and pitching defined the day, and as the series shifts to Griffith Stadium, Washington finds itself searching not for answers, but for oxygen.

SERIES 250
GAME 3 — Griffith Stadium
1946 Washington Senators 5
1952 Boston Red Sox 4 (15 innings)
Winning Pitcher: Walt Masterson (1–0)
Losing Pitcher: Randy Gumpert (0–1)
Save: None (walk-off win)
Home Runs:
Dom DiMaggio (BOS) — 2-run HR, 3rd inning
Player of the Game: Mickey Vernon — 6-for-8, 6 singles, catalyst of multiple rallies, sets extra-inning postseason hits record.
1952 Boston leads 2–1

Game 3 of Series 250 became an instant classic at Griffith Stadium, a 15-inning epic that swung on willpower, endurance, and one of the greatest individual offensive performances in Field of Dreams history. The Senators, desperate to avoid a 3–0 series deficit, played with relentless urgency, pounding out 19 hits yet needing every last one to finally subdue the Red Sox 5–4. Boston twice seized control—scoring two in the third and two more in the seventh—but Washington kept answering, tying the game three separate times, including Jerry Priddy’s two-out RBI single in the seventh that reignited a stadium already bracing for heartbreak. From that moment through the fifteenth, both teams lived on a knife’s edge: Boston stranded runners, Washington ran into double plays, and inning after inning slipped away with no breakthrough. Through it all, Mickey Vernon authored a masterpiece, going 6-for-8 and setting multiple extra-inning postseason records, his bat steadying the Senators every time the game threatened to drift toward Boston. The Washington bullpen—Hudson, Scarborough, and Masterson—was airtight across six scoreless frames, giving the offense the space it finally needed. In the bottom of the fifteenth, after nearly five hours of baseball, the Senators pushed across the winning run, sending Griffith Stadium into a roar and dragging themselves back into the series. A marathon, a classic, and a reminder that Washington will not exit Series 250 quietly.

SERIES 250
GAME 4 — Griffith Stadium
1946 Washington Senators 4
1952 Boston Red Sox 3
Winning Pitcher: Johnny Niggeling (1–0)
Losing Pitcher: Walt Masterson (0–1)
Save: None (complete game win)
Home Runs: None
Player of the Game: Johnny Niggeling — 9.0 IP, 5 H, 3 R (2 ER), 3 BB, 4 K, 121 pitches in a complete-game victory.
Series Score: Tied 2–2

Game 4 at Griffith Stadium unfolded as a tense, beautifully balanced contest that showcased Washington’s growing momentum and Boston’s refusal to yield, with the Senators ultimately prevailing 4–3 to even Series 250 at two games apiece. Johnny Niggeling authored a complete-game triumph built on craft rather than power, scattering five Boston hits over nine innings while leaning on his knuckleball to keep the Red Sox perpetually off balance. Washington chipped away early, scoring single runs in the second and fourth, and looked poised to ride Niggeling’s rhythm into a stress-free finish—until the eighth inning erupted. Boston stormed back with three runs, highlighted by Frank Hatfield’s double and Del Gernert’s sharp RBI single, igniting sudden panic in a stadium that had been quietly confident all afternoon. Yet Washington answered immediately in the bottom half when Jerry Priddy, with two outs and the bases loaded, laced a decisive two-run single that flipped the game—and perhaps the series—back in the Senators’ favor. Niggeling steadied himself with a flawless ninth, sealing a victory defined by resilience, precision, and a team that refuses to let history write its ending without a fight.

SERIES 250
GAME 5 — Griffith Stadium
1946 Washington Senators 5
1952 Boston Red Sox 0
Winning Pitcher: Roger Wolff (1–1)
Losing Pitcher: Mickey McDermott (1–1)
Save: None (complete-game shutout)
Home Runs: Stan Spence (WSH) — Grand Slam, 3rd inning
Player of the Game: Roger Wolff — 9.0 IP, 5 H, 0 R, 5 K, 127 pitches.
Series Score: Washington leads 3–2

Game 5 at Griffith Stadium delivered the most authoritative performance yet from a suddenly surging Washington club, as Roger Wolff’s complete-game shutout powered the Senators to a 5–0 victory and a stunning 3–2 series lead after once trailing 0–2. Wolff was masterful from the opening inning, mixing late movement with pinpoint control, scattering five Boston hits and never allowing the Red Sox to string together any momentum. His calm, unhurried approach set the tone for a Senators team that seized the game with one decisive swing: Stan Spence’s towering third-inning grand slam, a two-out jolt that electrified the ballpark and cracked Boston’s composure. Mickey McDermott battled gamely, but Washington’s patience and efficiency—drawing four walks while needing only three hits to produce all five runs—proved too much on an afternoon when Boston’s offense sagged under the weight of frustration. Every Washington defensive turn was crisp, every inning Wolff recorded seemed to tighten the screws further, and by the ninth the Senators were playing with the confidence of a team that suddenly believes in destiny. With the shutout complete and the series flipped on its head, Washington heads back to Fenway needing just one more win to finish a comeback that now feels not only possible, but inevitable.

SERIES 250
GAME 6 — Fenway Park
1946 Washington Senators 2
1952 Boston Red Sox 0
Winning Pitcher: Dutch Leonard (1–1)
Losing Pitcher: Mel Parnell (1–1)
Save: None (complete-game shutout)
Home Runs:None
Player of the Game: Dutch Leonard — 9.0 IP, 4 H, 0 R, 5 K, 127 pitches.
1946 Washington wins series 4 games to 2

Game 6 at Fenway Park carried the tension of a season hanging by a thread, and the 1946 Senators met the moment with precision and poise, shutting out the Red Sox 2–0 to take the series and advance in the Field of Dreams bracket. Dutch Leonard delivered a masterclass in quiet dominance, scattering four hits over nine innings while never allowing Boston’s lineup to breathe. His knuckleball floated with just enough late life to frustrate hitters, and whenever the Red Sox mounted even a hint of a threat, Leonard responded with soft contact or a well-spotted pitch to end the inning. Washington built its lead through disciplined, incremental offense—Jerry Priddy’s extra-base work set the early tone, Gene Torres punched home a critical two-out RBI in the second, and Leonard helped his own cause with a sacrifice fly in the seventh to make it 2–0. Boston pressed throughout but never found the swing that could crack Leonard’s rhythm, stranding runners and watching their season slowly narrow to a final out. When the last fly ball settled into a Washington glove, the Senators did not celebrate a championship—they simply earned the right to keep going, moving one step deeper into the vast, endless road of the Field of Dreams.

1946 Washington Senators Win Series 4 Games to 2

Series MVP:

(.448, 1 HR, 4 RBI, 1.053 OPS, 5 R, 1 2B)

[Nick Soulis]

Tournament Progress Report 250 Series Played

Every 10 series I will give a progress report on the competition including stats.

Leaders (single series)
Hits.............................................. ....Barney McCosky (1939 Tigers) - 16
HR................................................ ....Aaron Judge (2022 Yankees) - 6
RBI............................................... ....Babe Ruth (1920 Yankees) - 20
Strikeouts........................................ .Ed Walsh (1911 White Sox) - 25
Longest HR......................................Andy Carey (1958 Yankees) - 554 FT
Hardest Hit Ball................................Andy Carey (1958 Yankees) - 118.8
Best Game Performance Score.......Babe Ruth (1920 Yankees) - 138


Managerial Leaders
Most Wins...........Clint Hurdle - 27
Winning %...........Seven tied - 100%

Championship Clubs Eliminated
1. 1920 Cleveland Indians - Lost to 2013 Yankees
2. 2008 Philadelphia Phillies - Lost to 1940 Yankees
3. 1940 Cincinnati Reds - Lost to 2004 Pirates
4. 2006 St. Louis Cardinals - Lost to 1944 Braves
5. 1990 Cincinnati Reds - Lost to 1947 Indians
6. 2003 Florida Marlins - Lost to 1934 Senators

Incredible Comebacks (Teams down 0-3 to come back and win series)
1976 Baltimore Orioles over 2012 Miami Marlins

Franchise Records
Arizona Dbacks....................4-2
Atlanta/Mil Braves................11-2
Baltimore Orioles..................6-8
Boston Braves/Beans...........4-12
Boston Red Sox...................9-9
Brooklyn/LA Dodgers...........10-9
Chicago Cubs......................11-8
Chicago White Sox..............12-7
Cincinnati Reds....................15-10
Cleveland Indians/Naps.......14-12
Colorado Rockies................3-4
Detroit Tigers.......................16-11
Florida/Miami Marlins......... 3-5
Houston Astros....................2-5
KC Royals...........................6-7
Los Angeles Angels.............6-4
Milwaukee Brewers.............6-10
Minnesota Twins..................6-4
Montreal Expos...................3-4
New York Mets....................2-5
New York Yankees...............17-4
New York/SF Giants.............9-11
Philadelphia Phillies.............7-20
Philadelphia/Oak A's............8-18
Pittsburgh Pirates.................16-12
San Diego Padres................5-3
Seattle Mariners...................4-5
St. Louis Browns..................2-3
St. Louis Cardinals...............12-9
Tampa Bay Rays..................3-2
Texas Rangers.....................5-3
Toronto Blue Jays.................4-1
Washington Nationals..........1-4
Washington Senators...........5-14


Best/Worst Winning Percentage by Franchise:
New York Yankees - 17-4(.80)
Washington Nationals - 1-4 (.200)

Records By Decade
1900's.............................8-7
1910's.............................13-14
1920's.............................14-15
1930's.............................15-18
1940's.............................20-20
1950's.............................13-17
1960's.............................16-17
1970's.............................24-23
1980's.............................19-24
1990's.............................29-24
2000's.............................38-26
2010's.............................28-27
2020's.............................7-10

Best Season - 2004 - 10-0

Accomplishments Single Game
No Hitter - Vida Blue (1974 Athletics)
6-6 Jacoby Elsbury (2010 Red Sox)
10 RBI - Babe Ruth (1920 Yankees)
3 HR - Willie Mays (1961 Giants)
3 HR - Bernie Williams (2000 Yankees)
No Hitter - Sonny Gray (2019 Reds)

[Nick Soulis]

Field of Dreams Tournament — Series 241 to 250 Recap



A Commemoration of the Journey to 250 Series

Reaching the 250-series milestone feels less like a checkpoint and more like the unveiling of a monument built one pitch, one swing, one miracle at a time. This tournament has become a sprawling cathedral of baseball memory—years in the making—where every generation collides, every legend steps forward, and every matchup writes something new into the dust of the diamond. Across 250 best-of-seven battles, we have witnessed 65 Game Sevens, countless upsets, stretches of absolute dominance, and moments that only the strange perfection of baseball can conjure. This latest section, Series 241 through 250, embodied the spirit of the entire competition: improbable rallies, underdog triumphs, and iconic performances that will echo long after the box scores fade.

The 2003 Pittsburgh Pirates delivered the first thunderclap of the section, authoring one of the single most astonishing comebacks in tournament history. Down late and seemingly out of answers, they erupted for nine runs in the ninth inning of Game 3 to snatch victory from the 1908 Cardinals—a rally so explosive it reset the gravity of the entire series. They carried that momentum straight through to advancement, stamping their era into the story of the bracket.

Upsets followed in waves, none larger than the 1961 Kansas City Athletics, a 100-loss club in real-world memory, who toppled the 1965 Bob Gibson–led Cardinals across seven bruising games. In a tournament defined by giants, it was Wayne Causey and Norm Siebern who seized the narrative, turning a forgotten roster into an unforgettable one.

The Pirates appeared again in this stretch—this time the 2012 edition—playing with a kind of speed and swagger that overwhelmed the 2003 Phillies in five games. Starling Marte ran wild, the Pirates never eased up, and Clint Hurdle quietly became the winningest manager in Field of Dreams history. Whatever secret he carries into these alternate-universe dugouts, it seems to work.

Meanwhile, the 1983 Dodgers answered hype with resistance, tamping down the excitement surrounding Bo Jackson and the 1989 Royals. Los Angeles dispatched them in six steady, disciplined games—a reminder that expectation means nothing if the other side refuses to yield.

Series 250 offered a fitting capstone to the milestone celebration. The 1946 Senators, led by Mickey Vernon, took full advantage of a Ted Williams–less 1952 Red Sox club. Vernon was sensational, including a remarkable 6-for-8 performance that powered him to Series MVP honors and guided Washington to a defining victory in the quarter-millennium showcase.

Classic 1970s baseball—tight margins, stern pitching, defensive weight—unfolded between the 1972 Cardinals and the 1973 Brewers, where Bob Gibson’s poise set the tone. The Cardinals took the series in five behind a sharp, relentless effort, with Ted Sizemore stepping forward as the unexpected MVP.

In another Midwestern clash, the 2009 Minnesota Twins, grounded in the disciplined bats of Joe Mauer and Jason Kubel, outlasted the 1989 Brewers in six rugged, era-appropriate games. The series felt like a reminder of what late-2000s baseball stood for: clean execution, timely hitting, and zero hesitation.

The 1953 Braves, predating Milwaukee but carrying the same lineage of excellence, let Warren Spahn dictate the tempo. Spahn was locked in, surgical, and unbending as the Braves handled the 2019 Diamondbacks in five games, reaffirming their reputation as one of history’s quietly elite clubs.

Arizona appeared yet again in one of the section’s most intriguing intra-franchise duels. The 2003 Diamondbacks, built on overwhelming pitching and the thunder of Carlos Baerga’s grand-slam-ready bat, overcame Ketel Marte and the athletic, modern 2019 roster. It was a series defined by contrasts in baseball logic—old power vs. new precision—and once again, the older era held firm.

The section closed with what may be the best series of the ten: the 1987 Red Sox and the 2023 Cardinals trading punches deep into October dusk. The final game stretched to six hours and 14 innings, a marathon of tension and pressure until Paul Goldschmidt stroked the decisive hit at Fenway Park. Another crushing exit for this era of Boston baseball—though this time, no shadows of Buckner lingered. Just heartbreak and a tip of the cap to a worthy opponent.

Across these ten series, the Field of Dreams Tournament delivered everything that has made its first 250 chapters unforgettable—comebacks that defy logic, upstarts who rewrite history, legends who reaffirm it, and games that seem to slip the boundaries of time. The march toward 260 begins, and the next miracle is already warming up in the bullpen.

[Nick Soulis]

Series #251



1970 Minnesota Twins
Record: 98-64
Finish: Lost in ALCS
Manager: Bill Rigney
Ball Park: Metropolitan Stadium
WAR Leader: Tony Oliva (7.0)
Franchise Record: 6-4
1970 Season Record: 4-1
Hall of Famers: (5)
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/MIN/1970.shtml

1995 New York Mets
Record: 69-75
Finish: 2nd in NL East
Manager: Dallas Green
Ball Park: Shea Stadium
WAR Leader: Jeff Kent (3.2)
Franchise Record: 2-5
1995 Season Record: 2-1
Hall of Famers: (1)
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/NYM/1995.shtml
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Nick Soulis]

HEAVEN’S DUGOUT — SERIES #251 FULL PREVIEW SHOW
Field of Dreams | Signature 30-Minute Program

Panel:
Bob Costas (host)
Dan Shulman
Connie Mack
Leo Durocher

SEGMENT ONE — SETTING THE STAGE

Costas:
“Welcome back to Heaven’s Dugout. Series #251. When this project began, numbers were bookkeeping. Now they’re history. Two hundred and fifty series have already told us something important: the Field of Dreams does not reward reputation. It rewards endurance. Tonight, we turn our attention to a matchup that feels deceptively simple on paper and deeply complex in practice—the 1970 Minnesota Twins versus the 1995 New York Mets. Minnesota has home-field advantage, but as we’ve learned, Iowa has never been sentimental. Dan, when you first look at this pairing, what jumps out?”

Shulman:
“What jumps out is contrast, Bob, but not in the obvious way. This isn’t just old-school versus modern. It’s coherence versus volatility. The Twins arrive knowing exactly what kind of baseball they want to play every night. The Mets arrive capable of redefining a night on a whim. Over seven games, that’s not a stylistic footnote—that’s the entire story.”

Mack:
“Baseball clubs reveal themselves through repetition. The more often you ask a team to perform the same task under pressure, the more honest the answer becomes. Minnesota has been built to give the same answer again and again. New York has been built to surprise you. The field will decide which truth it prefers.”

Durocher:
“And let’s not pretend surprise is a weakness. Baseball history is littered with neat, organized teams that lost to somebody who didn’t care how things were supposed to look.”

SEGMENT TWO — THE 1970 MINNESOTA TWINS: STRUCTURE AND STRENGTH

Costas:
“Let’s begin with Minnesota. This is a team that doesn’t announce itself loudly but insists on being dealt with. Connie, how do you see this Twins club?”

Mack:
“I see a professional baseball team in the truest sense. They value the strike zone. They value position. They value turning tomorrow’s game into something predictable. Over a series, that steadiness is often mistaken for a lack of imagination. It is, in fact, discipline.”

Shulman:
“The Twins’ great advantage is that they don’t need a perfect version of themselves to win. They can survive an off night from a star. They can win close games without panic. They don’t chase momentum; they let it come to them.”

Durocher:
“I respect Minnesota, but I’ll say this: they’re comfortable when the game behaves. The Mets don’t care if the game behaves. If New York can disrupt Minnesota’s rhythm early—fast innings, early swings, uncomfortable counts—you start testing whether that structure bends or snaps.”

Costas:
“And yet, Leo, we’ve seen here that structure tends to outlast chaos when things get tight.”

Durocher:
“Unless chaos strikes first.”

SEGMENT THREE — THE 1995 NEW YORK METS: POWER AND POSSIBILITY

Costas:
“Let’s turn to New York. A team defined less by certainty and more by potential. Dan, what version of the Mets must appear for them to win this series?”

Shulman:
“They need to be decisive. Not perfect—decisive. Their power cannot be ornamental. It has to arrive in clusters. The Mets cannot afford solo statements. They need innings that flip games, innings that change how Minnesota feels about the next at-bat.”

Mack:
“There is danger in waiting for a miracle. The Mets must manufacture opportunity even as they search for force. Discipline does not belong exclusively to orderly teams.”

Durocher:
“I like this club because they don’t flinch. You can beat them for six innings and still lose the game. That’s a terrible feeling for an opponent. If the Mets keep games within reach, pressure migrates—from the challenger to the favorite.”

Costas:
“And Minnesota is the favorite here.”

Durocher:
“Exactly. Favorites feel gravity.”

SEGMENT FOUR — LEGACY, MANAGERS, AND THE LONG VIEW

Costas:
“Legacy matters here—not as nostalgia, but as expectation. Connie, what does a series like this test at a managerial level?”

Mack:
“It tests patience. Minnesota will not beat itself. New York might, if pressed. The correct response to adversity differs for each club. Minnesota must resist tightening. New York must resist unraveling.”

Shulman:
“We’ve seen in previous Field of Dreams series that Games 3 and 4 are decisive. That’s where identity asserts itself. By then, adjustments are exhausted, and habits take over.”

Durocher:
“And that’s where I favor the Mets. Habits can be exploited. You can predict Minnesota. You can’t always predict New York.”

Costas:
“But unpredictability cuts both ways.”

Durocher:
“So does control.”

SEGMENT FIVE — FINAL PREDICTIONS AND CLOSING

Costas:
“All right. No abstractions now. Seven games maximum. Who advances?”

Shulman:
“Minnesota in six. Too many ways to win. Too few ways to collapse.”

Mack:
“Minnesota in seven. The Mets will force this to the edge, but endurance wins more often than audacity.”

Durocher:
“Mets in seven. Because every long project needs a reminder that order is not destiny.”

Costas (closing):
“And that is why this series belongs here. Series #251 is not a referendum on eras—it’s a referendum on temperament. Control versus ignition. Expectation versus possibility. The Field of Dreams does not care who you were. It cares who you remain when the games repeat themselves. We’ll find out soon enough.”

The scoreboard doesn’t lie. The Field of Dreams continues.



GRANTLAND RICE — OFFICIAL PREVIEW COMMENTARY
Field of Dreams | Series #251

The game has always loved its arguments, and now it has found another worth settling beneath the Iowa sky.

Series #251 does not arrive with trumpets or banners. It arrives the way baseball prefers its truths—quietly, patiently, daring both sides to reveal themselves over time. The 1970 Minnesota Twins step onto this field as a team that believes order is not a preference but a duty. They bring with them the steady confidence of men who expect the game to make sense if played correctly often enough. They do not hunt miracles. They reduce them.

Across the grass stand the 1995 New York Mets, a club less concerned with order than opportunity. This is a team that believes baseball is not solved inning by inning, but stolen in moments—one swing, one lapse, one sudden reversal of fortune that turns a tidy evening into a restless night. Where Minnesota seeks to control the clock, New York seeks to break it.

History has shown that the Field of Dreams is a stern judge of temperament. It rewards teams that can repeat themselves without growing bored, that can fail without panicking, that can win without celebrating too early. Minnesota has been built with that lesson in its bones. Their strength lies not in brilliance, but in refusal—the refusal to give games away, the refusal to be hurried, the refusal to abandon structure when pressure begins to whisper.

Yet baseball, in its long memory, has never been faithful to structure alone. It has always kept a corner of its heart reserved for the unruly guest. The Mets arrive carrying that inheritance. They may look unfinished. They may appear volatile. But volatility, when paired with belief, has overturned stronger clubs than this one.

Seven games offer enough time for truth to emerge, but not enough time for excuses. If Minnesota prevails, it will be because discipline once again proved heavier than daring. If New York prevails, it will be because daring reminded discipline that the game was never meant to be safe.

Series #251 will not ask which team is better on paper. It will ask which team remains itself when repetition becomes pressure and pressure becomes memory. That question, as always, belongs to the game alone.

— Grantland Rice

[Nick Soulis]

Series #251



Mets Seize the Moment
New York Overwhelms Minnesota to Claim Series



SERIES #251
Game 1 | Metropolitan Stadium (Minneapolis)
Final Score:
1970 Minnesota Twins 6
1995 New York Mets 1
Winning Pitcher: Tom Hall (1–0)
Losing Pitcher: Bobby Jones (0–1)
Save:None
Home Runs:Harmon Killebrew (MIN) — 2-run HR, 4th inning
Player of the Game:
Tom Hall — 8.0 IP, 3 H, 0 R, 12 K
1970 Minnesota leads series 1–0

The opener of Series #251 unfolded as a study in patience and authority, with the **1970 Minnesota Twins** imposing their will late to secure a 6–1 victory over the **1995 New York Mets** at rain-soaked Metropolitan Stadium. After a 33-minute delay in the fourth inning stalled early momentum, the game turned decisively when **Harmon Killebrew** crushed a two-run home run to break a scoreless tie, signaling the moment Minnesota had been waiting for. From there, left-hander **Tom Hall** tightened his grip on the afternoon, carving through the Mets’ lineup with precision and confidence, allowing just three hits over eight shutout innings while striking out twelve to set a Field of Dreams playoff record. New York struggled to generate sustained pressure, frequently falling behind in counts and leaving opportunities scattered rather than assembled, while Minnesota methodically expanded the margin with a four-run eighth inning highlighted by **Tony Oliva**’s run-scoring triple and timely production throughout the lineup. A lone ninth-inning run spared the Mets from the shutout, but by then the tone had long been set: Minnesota dictated tempo, absorbed the elements, and delivered the first firm statement of the series, taking a 1–0 lead with the kind of controlled performance that defines their identity.

SERIES #251
Game 2 | Metropolitan Stadium (Minneapolis)
Final Score:
1995 New York Mets 11
1970 Minnesota Twins 2
Winning Pitcher:
Bill Pulsipher (1–0)
Losing Pitcher:
Bert Blyleven (0–1)
Home Runs: David Segui (NYM) — 3-run HR
Richie Brogna (NYM) — 3-run HR
Harmon Killebrew (MIN) — Solo HR
Bob Allison (MIN) — Solo HR
Player of the Game:
David Segui — 4 RBI, HR, 2 BB
Series tied 1–1

Game 2 of Series #251 marked a sharp reversal in tone, as the **1995 New York Mets** overwhelmed the **1970 Minnesota Twins** with an 11–2 rout at Metropolitan Stadium to even the series. New York seized control early with a three-run second inning and never allowed Minnesota to settle, consistently attacking **Bert Blyleven** before he could establish rhythm or command. The decisive blow came in the sixth inning when **David Segui** launched a three-run home run, punctuating a day in which the Mets combined patience with force and turned steady pressure into separation. Minnesota briefly answered with back-to-back solo homers from **Harmon Killebrew** and Bob Allison in the seventh, but the response was cosmetic, as the Mets piled on four more runs in the eighth to remove any doubt. On the mound, **Bill Pulsipher** delivered eight composed innings, limiting the Twins to three hits and ensuring the series would head east knotted at one game apiece, its balance restored and its tension fully alive.

FIELD OF DREAMS — SERIES #251
Game 3 | Shea Stadium (New York)
Final Score:
1995 New York Mets 10
1970 Minnesota Twins 2
Winning Pitcher:
Jason Isringhausen (1–0)
Losing Pitcher:
Jim Perry (0–1)
Home Runs:
Bobby Bonilla (NYM) — 3-run HR, 1st inning
Player of the Game:
David Segui — 3-for-5, 4 RBI, 2 R
1995 New York leads series 2–1

Game 3 of Series #251 marked the moment the series truly tilted, as the **1995 New York Mets** carried their Game 2 momentum home to Shea Stadium and dismantled the **1970 Minnesota Twins** with a convincing 10–2 victory to seize a 2–1 series lead. The tone was set immediately when **Bobby Bonilla** crushed a three-run home run in the first inning off **Jim Perry**, igniting the crowd and placing Minnesota back on its heels before it could settle. New York continued to apply relentless pressure in the fourth inning, when a bases-loaded double by **David Segui** blew the game open, part of a dominant three-hit, four-RBI afternoon that underscored the Mets’ growing confidence at the plate. While Minnesota briefly scratched out two runs in the middle innings, defensive breakdowns—including five errors—only deepened the hole, turning manageable innings into extended trouble. On the mound, **Jason Isringhausen** delivered a workmanlike but authoritative complete game, scattering four hits and keeping the Twins from ever mounting sustained pressure. By the final out, Shea Stadium had transformed the series narrative: what began as a disciplined Minnesota script had become a Mets-led affair driven by aggression, execution, and momentum firmly in New York’s favor.

FIELD OF DREAMS — SERIES #251
Game 4 | Shea Stadium (New York)
Final Score:
1995 New York Mets 7
1970 Minnesota Twins 0
Winning Pitcher:
Bret Saberhagen (1–0)
Losing Pitcher:
Jim Kaat (0–1)
Home Runs:
Bobby Bonilla (NYM) — 2-run HR, 1st inning
Todd Hundley (NYM) — 2-run HR, 5th inning
Player of the Game:
Bret Saberhagen — 8.0 IP, 6 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 5 K
1995 New York leads series 3–1

Game 4 of Series #251 pushed the matchup to the brink, as the **1995 New York Mets** delivered a methodical 7–0 shutout of the **1970 Minnesota Twins** at Shea Stadium to take a commanding 3–1 series lead. New York seized control immediately when **Bobby Bonilla** launched a two-run home run in the first inning off **Jim Kaat**, setting the tone for an afternoon in which Minnesota was never allowed to settle. The Mets steadily widened the margin with relentless pressure in the third inning and put the game out of reach in the fifth on a two-run homer by **Todd Hundley**, while Minnesota’s offense repeatedly stalled despite scattered hits. On the mound, **Bret Saberhagen** was calm and authoritative, scattering six singles over eight shutout innings and refusing to issue a walk, silencing a Twins lineup that had defined itself all season by patience and control. By the final out, the series had shifted from a measured chess match into a test of survival, with the Mets one win from advancing and the Twins facing elimination.

FIELD OF DREAMS — SERIES #251
Game 5 | Shea Stadium (New York)
Final Score:
1995 New York Mets 7
1970 Minnesota Twins 1
Winning Pitcher:
Bobby Jones (1–1)
Losing Pitcher:
Tom Hall (1–1)
Home Runs:
Bobby Bonilla (NYM) — 2-run HR, 3rd inning
Player of the Game:
Bobby Jones — 8.2 IP, 8 H, 1 R, 7 K

Game 5 brought Series #251 to a decisive close at Shea Stadium, as the 1995 New York Mets pulled away late to defeat the 1970 Minnesota Twins 7–1 and clinch the series in five games. Minnesota struck first with a lone run in the opening inning and briefly threatened to extend the afternoon, but New York methodically absorbed the early pressure before seizing control in the third, when Bobby Bonilla launched a two-run home run to swing the game firmly in the Mets’ favor. The contest remained competitive through the middle innings as Tom Hall battled traffic, but the decisive moment arrived in the seventh, when New York erupted for five runs, turning tension into inevitability and the stadium into a celebration. On the mound, Bobby Jones delivered a poised, near-complete performance, allowing just one run over 8⅔ innings and denying the Twins any sustained rally. By the final out, the Mets had completed a four-game surge defined by adaptation and control, closing Series #251 with authority and sending Minnesota home having been steadily worn down after a promising start.

1995 New York Mets Win Series 4 Games To 1

Series MVP:

(.381, 3 HR, 9 RBI, 6 R, .409 OBP, 1.266 OPS)

[Nick Soulis]

Series #252



2008 Minnesota Twins
Record: 88-75
Finish: 2nd in AL West
Manager: Ron Gardenhire
Ball Park: Metrodome
WAR Leader: Joe Mauer (5.6)
Franchise Record: 6-5
2002 Season Record: 1-2
Hall of Famers: (1)
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/MIN/2008.shtml

1956 Pittsburgh Pirates
Record: 66-88
Finish: 7th in NL
Manager: Bobby Bragen
Ball Park: Forbes Field
WAR Leader: Bob Friend (5.2)
Franchise Record: 16-12
1956 Season Record: 2-2
Hall of Famers: (2)
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/PIT/1956.shtml
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Nick Soulis]

FIELD OF DREAMS — SERIES #252
HEAVEN’S DUGOUT: FULL SERIES PREVIEW
Hosted by Bob Costas
Panel: Nolan Ryan • Mike Trout • Al Michaels

Opening Segment — Setting the Frame

Bob Costas:
“Good evening from the Field of Dreams. Series #252 asks a deceptively simple question: when structure meets instinct, which one survives seven games? The 2008 Minnesota Twins arrive as a club built to reduce chaos—strike-throwing, defensive reliability, situational offense. Across from them, the 1956 Pittsburgh Pirates represent a time when the game was chaos by design—contact, speed, pressure, and relentless balls in play. This panel isn’t here to admire nostalgia. We’re here to decide who actually wins.”

Segment I — Twins Identity (Player-First Breakdown)

Bob Costas:
“Let’s start with Minnesota. Nolan, this rotation defines the series early.”

Nolan Ryan:
“Absolutely. This team goes as Scott Baker, Kevin Slowey, and Nick Blackburn go. None of them overpower you the way I did, but they throw strikes, they change speeds, and they don’t beat themselves. Against a contact-heavy Pirates lineup, that matters. You fall behind, you’re dead. Minnesota doesn’t fall behind often.”

Mike Trout:
“And defensively, this team supports its pitchers. Joe Mauer isn’t just an MVP bat—he controls the running game better than people remember. Justin Morneau gives you length in the order, but Michael Cuddyer and Denard Span are just as important. Span sets pressure at the top, and Cuddyer punishes mistakes. This isn’t a lineup built to explode—it’s built to outlast.”

Al Michaels:
“What’s fascinating is how modern this feels. The Twins don’t chase. They don’t panic. In a best-of-seven, that steadiness has historically aged very well.”

Segment II — Pirates Identity (Player-First Breakdown)

Bob Costas:
“Now Pittsburgh. Al, this is your wheelhouse.”

Al Michaels:
“The 1956 Pirates are not trying to impress you on a spreadsheet. They’re trying to move you backward one base at a time. Dick Groat is the engine—contact, situational awareness, leadership. Roberto Clemente is already a force here, even before the legend fully forms. He changes games with his arm, his bat, and his presence.”

Nolan Ryan:
“As a pitcher, I’ll say this plainly: teams like this are exhausting. Bill Mazeroski and Frank Thomas—you can’t relax. You’re always one ground ball away from trouble. And Vern Law on the mound? He won a Cy Young for a reason. He lives on the edges and lets you get yourself out.”

Mike Trout:
“This is uncomfortable baseball for modern teams. The Pirates don’t care about exit velocity. They care about whether you’re standing where the ball’s going. Over seven games, that pressure compounds.”

Segment III — Tactical Debate: Where the Series Turns

Bob Costas:
“So where does this series turn?”

Nolan Ryan:
“It turns on control versus contact. If Minnesota’s starters keep the Pirates off the bases, the Twins win this series. Period. But if Pittsburgh strings hits, forces throws, steals bags—Minnesota’s margin disappears.”

Mike Trout:
“I think it turns on Joe Mauer versus Vern Law. If Mauer controls at-bats, slows the game down, Minnesota dictates pace. If Law induces early contact and keeps Mauer from seeing pitches deep, Pittsburgh gains momentum fast.”

Al Michaels:
“And don’t underestimate late innings. The Twins’ bullpen depth versus Pittsburgh’s ability to manufacture runs late—that’s where legends quietly form.”

Segment IV — Legacy Stakes

Bob Costas:
“Legacy always lingers here. What’s at stake?”

Al Michaels:
“For the Pirates, this is about validating a style that history has gradually pushed aside. A win here argues that instinct never went out of style—it was simply ignored.”

Mike Trout:
“For the Twins, it reinforces the modern team concept. No single superstar carrying you—everyone contributing. It’s a quiet legacy, but a powerful one.”

Nolan Ryan:
“And for players like Clemente and Mauer, this is cross-era proof. Not hypotheticals. Results.”

Segment V — Predictions

Bob Costas:
“Time to commit. Nolan?”

Nolan Ryan:
“Twins in seven. Pitching discipline wins—but it won’t be comfortable.”

Mike Trout:
“I’m going Pirates in six. Too much pressure, too many balls in play. Minnesota won’t get breathers.”

Al Michaels:
“Twins in six. The Pirates will make it ugly, but structure usually outlasts chaos.”

Bob Costas (closing):
“A split panel, which feels appropriate. Two eras. Two philosophies. One field that doesn’t care who remembers whom. Series #252 is not about romance. It’s about survival.”