|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watertown, New York
Posts: 4,567
|
It's directly analagous to New York City. New York has districts (five boroughs), each of which used to be a separate city. And some of these cities' boundaries are coterminous with county boundaries with different names. For examples, Brooklyn is also Kings County and Manhattan is also New York County. New York 'started' on an island (the island of Manhattan), and Manhattan itself contained many villages that were absorbed into the city as it grew.
The problem comes in that Hong Kong has a semi-independent legislature, constitution, legal system, etc. If the cities were listed as SMSAs, Hong Kong would absolutely qualify. Since the game uses the populations based on totally arbitrary geographical boundaries, counting it as a nation could be more appropriate, but then what do you do with Macau? I have a China League in a 2006 game I haven't converted yet. One of the teams is located in Hong Kong; what can I expect to have happen to that team when I convert? |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 108
|
I think that that last site just continues the common misconception that Hong Kong is a city. According to my research, Hong Kong is a province of China, so Markus and Co. where right in listing it as such. Kowloon is listed as it's largest city. Hong Kong Island itself is divided into four districts. Victoria City, former capital of the Colony of Hong Kong, is located on Hong Kong Island (just across the Harbor from Kowloon) and is listed as the second largest city.
Any league having a team in Hong Kong could still use the Hong Kong moniker, they would just have to list its home town as any of the cities in the province, most likely Kowloon or Victoria, though these are listed differently in the cities.txt file.
__________________
Download my OOTP 6 to OOTP 2006 Schedule Converter: http://www.ootpdevelopments.com/boar...d.php?t=121664 |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
Then you would have to do the same think with Beijing because it is also a provence. You are simply being stubborn. The government in Hong Kong calls it a city. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
I'll post this again as you seem to have missed it...from the city of Hong Kongs own tourist office http://www.discoverhongkong.com/eng/...ps/index.jhtml Quote:
Last edited by bababui; 04-15-2007 at 01:48 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheltenham, England
Posts: 7,644
|
Quote:
I guess then both the big "city" and the districts are listed for Hong Kong as it is for New York City.Quote:
As for Macau, I'd suggest as the current political scenario stands, it should be listed as both a city, and a country, as it is a city-state. ![]() Quote:
Quote:
And like with Puerto Rico, as it competes separately in international sporting events, I believe it should be listed as a separate nation as it stands.
Last edited by Sdpm100; 04-15-2007 at 03:53 PM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watertown, New York
Posts: 4,567
|
Quote:
And, by the way, bababui had a separate issue in his originating post. Does anyone remember what it was? Last edited by Curtis; 04-16-2007 at 03:22 AM. Reason: confused 'thread' with 'post' |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14,147
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
This is kinda silly. We are confusing the political argument with the geographical one. In the context of OOTP, Hong Kong should definitly be a city. For example, Toronto is listed as a city while another of Canada's largest cities, Mississauga, isnt listed because it somehow falls under the heading of greater Toronto.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheltenham, England
Posts: 7,644
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xianggangdao Quote:
FYI, here's the thread for the missing Toronto "cities": http://www.ootpdevelopments.com/boar...d.php?t=122787 Last edited by Sdpm100; 04-15-2007 at 05:30 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheltenham, England
Posts: 7,644
|
Okay, based on what I've found online, these are the Hong Kong cities as they are known as (in order of cities used in the default text file). I've filled in the co-ordinates for the two cities that were missing them, and added Macau and Hong Kong for those who want them.
sources - http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/showflat....77/Main/163065 http://www.epictrip.com/Cities_in_Ch...aces-l191.html and Google for matching places to co-ordinates. Code:
Tai Po,332721,42,Hong Kong,22.45,114.16 Kowloon,1985493,42,Hong Kong,22.32,114.17 Kwai Chung,471636,42,Hong Kong,22.37,114.13 Tsuen Wan,271238,42,Hong Kong,22.37,114.11 Sai Kung,456020,42,Hong Kong,22.33,114.33 Sha Tin,653423,42,Hong Kong,22.38,114.19 Sheung Shui,398201,42,Hong Kong,22.52,114.12 Victoria,1320413,42,Hong Kong,22.27,114.14 Tseung Kwan O,455895,42,Hong Kong,22.33,114.25 Yuen Long,542373,42,Hong Kong,22.44,114.02 Tuen Mun,503192,42,Hong Kong,22.41,113.98 Macau,431000,42,Macau,22.17,113.55 Hong Kong,6748389,42,Hong Kong,22.33,114.18 Last edited by Sdpm100; 04-15-2007 at 07:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watertown, New York
Posts: 4,567
|
Thank you. Great work!
(And apparently even baba doesn't remember what his other issue was, so I'll just slink on out of here….) |
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watertown, New York
Posts: 4,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cheltenham, England
Posts: 7,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,538
|
Does anything further need to be addressed/discussed here, or should I close this thread out?
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watertown, New York
Posts: 4,567
|
It's looking like bababui no longer cares about his cities being recognized, then not. So, I'd say close it. Steve said (up in General Discussions) that some of this nomenclature stuff has been addressed and some won't be. That's probably all we can expect.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|